Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TX5C\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:48:18 -0500
Good Morning All, What a pleasant surprise this morning to come down into the shack, and, instead of being greeted by the usual QRN din that is fast becoming the norm in these parts, to hear -- and t
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00021.html (6,450 bytes)

2. Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: calle.jonsson@sverige.nu
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:50:12 +0100 (CET)
TX5C was heard in Sweden this morning. Unfortunately they keep working US stns during our very short greyline/sunrise period. Same thing on 80 mtrs. We have about 30 mins around sunrise when it shoul
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00022.html (6,699 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:15:44 -0800
Expect that to change. They're only about 2,000 miles from me, so I hear them pretty well on most bands. They worked EU most of last night on 75M, then JA this morning. The website for this DXpeditio
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00023.html (7,690 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: Danilo Brelih <danilo.brelih@siol.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:33:40 +0100
calle.jonsson@sverige.nu pravi: And bad frequency selection on 1827,0 with strong carrier in EU. Already asked pilot stations for moving them from running freq. CUL Dan, S50U -- http://s50u.s50e.si _
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00024.html (7,025 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "rz0af" <rz0af@rambler.ru>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:34:01 +0700
You are lucky. 80% NA! As-11% - it is JA. May be its cool. But they dont think that I am not JA and not NA. I am from zone 18. Yesterday at 11z wall of JA on the 80m, today in this time they worked w
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00025.html (7,401 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:04:12 -0600
This morning (NA time) VK3ZL mentioned to me that 1827 was a bad QRG due to a strong, ever-present broadcast spur. I asked the TX5 op to QSY up to 1828. He thanked me, acknowledged my request, and i
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00026.html (8,167 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "Herbert Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:04:14 -0400
. The TX5 op, so far, has not been as strong on TB here as VP6 and they were plagued this morning with QRN. I can not agree with Dave on the TX5C TB signal strength nor on their ability to RX. VP6DX
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00028.html (8,601 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:45:13 -0800
I've got two transmit antennas here for topband -- an 86 ft top loaded Tee vertical and a dipole at 110 ft broadside to about 55 degrees. For some reason, the dipole has been almost 10 dB better than
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00029.html (8,626 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:32:10 -0600
to some Herb. . .I'm confused. I believe we are agreeing (rather than disagreeing) that VP6 had a superior signal and possibly better receive capability. That said, I hope my comments are not taken
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00030.html (9,845 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
VP6DX was incredibly strong here, more commensurate with the distance to Clipperton. I must have been strong there too, as I had no trouble working them through the pile. TX5C has been merely adequat
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00033.html (9,071 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "Herbert Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400
disagreeing) Dave, We both agree on the comparison...I just read your post wrong. Maybe the locations can not be compared by just signal levels over the course of each DX-Pedition but whatever the c
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00036.html (8,777 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad" <la5he@otterstad.dk>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:43:21 +0100
TX5C was heard in Sweden this morning. Unfortunately they keep working US stns during our very short greyline/sunrise period. Same thing on 80 mtrs. We have about 30 mins around sunrise when it shoul
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00038.html (8,662 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: Nagi <nagi@nmt.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:50:17 +0900
So far, we can't help saying that 160m operation of TX5C is miserable here in Japan. We can hear their signals for about 4 hours from the sunset in Japan to the sunrise there everyday but they have n
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00039.html (8,227 bytes)

14. Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:31:24 -0400
I've always found the best way to get the attention of a DXpedition is to contact them before the operation to tell them when to be QRV for my area. Next if after the first day they are not paying at
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00040.html (9,067 bytes)

15. Topband: TX5C (score: 1)
Author: ROBERT FERGUSON <gm3yts@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:27:50 +0000 (GMT)
Well this morning (Tuesday ) they were starting to peak at West EU sunrise and worked G4GED then worked some more US then worked a PA0 then 30 mins before our sunrise with their signal building they
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00043.html (7,777 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu