Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Term\s+\"cancel\s+fields\"\,\s+apology\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Term\s+\"cancel\s+fields\"\,\s+apology\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Term "cancel fields", apology (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:10:41 -0400; This is a non-issue, Tom. It stems from what I meant when I said "cancel fields". Apparently some considerable number, even the majority, think this phrase means cancel fields entirely. To others thi; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00022.html (10,608 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Term "cancel fields", apology (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:16:48 -0700; I thought your NCJ piece was quite clear. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00024.html (7,021 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Term "cancel fields", apology (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:48:30 -0400; Hi Guy, I think it is a critical issue, because it demonstrates the difference between EM radiation and induction fields that only store and return energy to the system. Then the question arises, how; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00028.html (9,393 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Term "cancel fields", apology (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 01:08:58 -0400; Hi Tom, You are very close, just a couple additional details. First, NEC4 can add up the field vectors from the various wires in the FCP and determine that in the far field, those fields add up to a; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00034.html (14,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]