Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+The\s+\"Magic\-T\"\s+vs\s+0\s+degree\s+and\s+180\s+degree\s+hybrid\s+combiner\/splitters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+The\s+\"Magic\-T\"\s+vs\s+0\s+degree\s+and\s+180\s+degree\s+hybrid\s+combiner\/splitters\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: The "Magic-T" vs 0 degree and 180 degree hybrid combiner/splitters (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:45:24 -0800; Ham radio literature often IMHO misuses the term "magic tee" to refer to a transformer-based 0 degree hybrid combiner/splitter. AFAIK, a magic tee is a WAVEGUIDE device as explained here: https://www; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00061.html (9,860 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: The "Magic-T" vs 0 degree and 180 degree hybrid combiner/splitters (score: 1): Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:45:12 +0000; Hi All, Rick I have to agree with you up to a point. Your 9 circle and other 8 circle receiving arrays except mine are on wide footprints and only use 4 active antennas at a time. All of my antennas; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00063.html (10,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]