Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Three\s+Port\s+Rx\s+antenna\s+splitter\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Frank VO1HP <invl160@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 08:00:14 -0500
Does anyone have a schematic for a 75ohm three port splitter using #73 binocular cores. I have those on hand. Need to feed beverage to two TS590SGs and Skimmer SDR in CQWW160. 73 Frank VO1HP -- Sent
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00247.html (6,522 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 07:46:17 +1300
Hi Frank, I don't know anything about 3-way splitters, but if I were in your situation I think I would sacrifice 1 dB and make a 4-way splitter using 3x 2-way splitters. 2-way is much more commonly u
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00250.html (7,295 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Eric NO3M <no3m@no3m.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:57:10 -0500
Frank If you really want a 3-port splitter, see here: http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/splitter-3.png Two more common alternatives using 2-port splitters: http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00251.html (8,063 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Eric NO3M <no3m@no3m.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 14:45:50 -0500
Corrected the autotransformer turns/tap on the 2-way splitter examples... http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/splitters.png If you really want a 3-port splitter, see here: http://no3m.net/wp-c
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00252.html (8,323 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 06:00:28 -0600
Frank, If too much trouble to make a proper splitter, a $2.00 TV splitter will work fine. The specs say they are good for 5-1000 MHz. but I've used them in years past on 160m and seriously doubt that
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00259.html (8,337 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Frank VO1HP <invl160@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 07:25:21 -0500
Ok Stan that's a great tip.....I have several at home and will investigate. Am in ve3 land for Xmas returning dec 28. 73 Frank vo1hp _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00260.html (8,644 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:23:10 -0500
I'd avoid the TV splitters, quality is all over the place and the lower frequency limit varies. You would really want to measure the loss at 1.8 MHz before committing to use one. I've been playing ar
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00262.html (8,258 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Three Port Rx antenna splitter (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 20:17:02 -0500
When I get home tomorrow, I will sweep a few of cable splitters and see what they look like. I have used them or spitting receivers in HF and VHF many times. Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable A
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00266.html (8,949 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu