- 1. Topband: To JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: rick darwicki via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 17:25:32 +0000 (UTC)
- There is no question......... get them anyway you can mixed. If you want an all CW, SSB or Digital, go for it but don't belittle guys that don't have 500 ft. beverages in 6 directions and full size 4
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00087.html (7,922 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: To JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 13:51:27 -0400
- Right! When we see some of issues that are popping up now, such as remotes being used outside ones entity but claimed as inside, to argue about which mode is worthy or not, is misguided. In addition,
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00088.html (7,983 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: To JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: Art Roberts <w1aer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 14:10:29 -0400
- This sounds like a question that will always be around. To me the great thing about all of this is the increase in activity on a band that does have some rough times with propagation. I know that for
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00089.html (9,445 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:35:00 -0400
- The way I see it, do what you enjoy. That's what's great about this hobby. There are so many things you can do and digimodes and JT are just one of them. Here's an example for you guys. Warwick, E51W
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00111.html (8,217 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:47:12 +0000
- In reality, this is why we have triple play and mode specific awards. The CW only people can stay on CW, sideband on sideband, etc. In a way, Joe Taylor and the wsjt developers are probably more in t
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00117.html (9,236 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 14:09:18 -0400
- JT is not CW and not SSB, why it is not a category by itself. SSB CW and Digital. DXCC JT modes. Regards JC N4IS In reality, this is why we have triple play and mode specific awards. The CW only peop
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00118.html (10,476 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 14:28:30 -0400
- Hi JC, That's true, but it is an endorsement for WAS. And since the DXCC categories were not delivered to us a part of the 10 commandments, it can change at any moment. :^) 73 de Vince, VA3VF DXCC JT
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00119.html (8,195 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 14:38:10 -0400
- QRP is not a mode per se, but after alot of 'pressure', the ARRL relented and now issues a DXCC QRP award, albeit unnumbered, and outside of the mainstream DXCC. Nobody has been forced to apply for o
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00120.html (8,536 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 21:07:10 +0000
- Have a great day, --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy "Actions speak louder than words" 1856 - Abraham Lincoln QRP is not a mode per se, but after alot of 'pressure', the ARRL relented and now issues a DXC
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00124.html (9,922 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
- Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:50:07 -0400
- Ok...I guess that's a hint to shut up. 73 de Vince, VA3VF QRT. Have a great day, --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy "Actions speak louder than words" 1856 - Abraham Lincoln _________________ Topband Refle
- /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00127.html (8,505 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu