Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Top\s+Band\s+and\s+JT65\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Top\s+Band\s+and\s+JT65\s*$/: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:08:49 -0500; Ok, per your request, here's Joe Taylor's first reply (thank you, Joe! :-). My second question --and Joe's reply-- follows, below the first reply. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com As you should expect, the cor; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00129.html (12,202 bytes)
62. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 18:28:54 -0400; On the contrary Cecil; I think that due to the fact that this long-going thread has not had people ejected from the list nor has had intervention by the moderator shows that all of us are indeed tryi; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00130.html (10,711 bytes)
63. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:40:02 -0500; There are two separate threads in this thread. 1. One is the effectiveness of the JT modes. Let's keep that going, by all means! 2. The other is an issue of emotion. How about if we just drop that pa; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00131.html (9,454 bytes)
64. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:59:00 -0500; Hi Rick, That's a very good question indeed! If we would go back through the Topband archives, I think that a major factor in this is the CW skill of the operator. Some are not so good (and we should; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00132.html (11,420 bytes)
65. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Renee K6FSB <k6fsb.1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:25:18 -0700; I second this as I was learning about some other modes...now whether I (to )use them or not is another story and a personal one (for each to decide). Tnx Renée, K6FSB 1. One is the effectiveness of t; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00133.html (10,717 bytes)
66. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:36:26 -0700; In the context of this discussion I think RTTY is an "in between" mode. Decoding is done with a computer (or in the radio if you have a K3) but I've never seen a decode on a signal that I couldn't he; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00134.html (10,473 bytes)
67. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 06:13:09 +0000; Mark, What you are saying is, that by using the K1JT shorthand messages, i e single carriers representing a report, confirmation "RRR" and "73" we are seeing a wonderful advancement in communication; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00135.html (9,831 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 67
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]