- 1. Topband: Top hat vertical (score: 1)
- Author: "Marco. A. Quijada" <ce1tbn@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:53:38 -0400
- someone is familiar with the antennas T load vertical for 80 meters CE1TBN Enviado desde mi iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00099.html (6,246 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Top hat vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:30:10 -0400
- I have had excellent success modeling "Marconi T" verticals with EZNEC. The Demo version can do a Marconi T just fine. Comparison with real world results in my backyard was very good, with EZNEC's pr
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00100.html (7,147 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Top hat vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:49:04 -0700
- Same here. My T vertical for 160 is 100 ft vertical and 82 ft horizontal. That makes the antenna resonant below the band, with a feedpoint Z of 50 ohms plus some inductive reactance on 160M. I add se
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00101.html (7,597 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Top Hat Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 05:35:35 -0400
- ?Same here. My T vertical for 160 is 100 ft vertical and 82 ft horizontal. That makes the antenna resonant below the band, with a feedpoint Z of 50 ohms plus some inductive reactance on 160M. I add s
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00000.html (6,530 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Top Hat Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:39:50 -0700
- Hi Ed, The height of my Tee vertical was determined by the rigging points in trees to support the ends, with the design guideline that higher is better. :) The length of the top was then determined b
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00001.html (7,837 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu