Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+84\,\s+Issue\s+25\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 84, Issue 25 (score: 1)
Author: "Howard W3CQH" <hsgorden@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:34:25 -0500
Questions: Of either a 12' or 33' or 43' VERTICALS - which one is best? Who is the MFG?? 73 Howard W3CQH == _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00194.html (8,390 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 84, Issue 25 (score: 1)
Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:11:33 -0600
for 160m it's simple, the closer to a 1/4 wave (130 feet) you get the better radiator or rather the less losses so more radiated power. My 13 foot tall antenna is made by Hi-Q -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Mo
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00195.html (8,179 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu