Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+QRP\s+WAS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+QRP\s+WAS\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 21:38:13 -0800; I'm still working on this, and need a handful of states. They are CT, VT, WV, KY, SC, andMS. I'm 70 miles S of San Francisco, on the coast. The best time to make these QSOs has been in the 90 or so m; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00050.html (6,796 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 08:40:29 -0800; The best time to make these QSOs has been in the 90 or so minutes before local sunrise at the east coast end, and for perhaps 30-45 minutes after local sunrise. If you're calling CQ, I'll find you an; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00057.html (7,913 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 09:50:24 -0800; I found condx pretty stinko last night to the east coast. Lots of W1 spotted, none heard. K8JQ was heard, but not loud. The very dependable NO3M and WD5R were not very loud and didn't hear me. Let's; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00058.html (9,028 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: K4OWR <k2owr@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 13:14:37 -0500; you guys use most. I often go up to the shack around 9pm and listen around for an hour or so, but rarely hear much activity other then the local obnoxious ragchewers who will complain to me that I'm; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00059.html (10,690 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 13:20:23 -0500; I'm a relative newbie on 160 (about 5 years) but it seems most DX hangs out on CW between 1820 and 1835. The situation may be different during contests, due to channel availability. 73 de NK8X ______; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00060.html (11,238 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 10:30:26 -0800; 160M is a CW band for anything but mindless ragchewing. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00061.html (8,255 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 10:38:10 -0800; In addition to all of that, with legal limit power and decent vertical antenna, I can work 800 miles in the daylight hours. 73, Jim K9YC Santa Cruz, CA I worked a station in ENY in the contest yeste; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00062.html (8,253 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 10:43:08 -0800; 73, Jim K9YC _________________ During the sunspot minimum a few years ago, I worked European Russia on 160 phone. Rick N6RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_t; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00063.html (8,236 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 10:52:53 -0800; Yes. Stations in w8, W9, and VE3 are often loud and clear during these hours, but are mostly using RX antennas aimed at EU, so are very difficult to work. I once worked a VE3 and/or a W9 in this time; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00064.html (8,444 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: DL1AMQ@web.de; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 20:13:37 +0100; During last few days/weeks I see a dramatic difference of DXpropagation in 80m vs. 160m band. On 80m I worked US states CA and WA during US SS contest while no one US station can be really heard on T; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00065.html (9,545 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:49:47 -0500; Jim, since you bring up QRP on 160M, I would like to promote the upcoming NAQCC 160M QRP sprint. 0130Z-0330Z January 13 2016 (which I think means it's our Tuesday night). http://naqcc.info/sprint2016; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00068.html (10,686 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:58:24 -0500; Rich, you comment on the "combat zone" aspect of ARRL 160M in past years and how it's not so bad this year. I agree that past couple years it was brutal but last night, not so bad. I don't feel activ; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00070.html (10,288 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:50:04 -0500; Guten abend, Thomas. John Devoldere in his books states that 160 meter band is a different band than all others. 80 meters can be predicted/modeled fairly accurately. But 160 is still full of wonder; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00073.html (9,083 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: Topband QRP WAS (score: 1): Author: Charles Moizeau <w2sh@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:25:02 -0500; Incorrect date and day. According to NAQCC their annual NAQCC 160m sprint will occur in North America on FRIDAY, 15 January 2016. This can be seen at: http://www.naqcc.info/SprintEastern.txt 72, Char; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00122.html (11,644 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]