Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Using\s+CAT5\s+in\s+place\s+of\s+coax\s+\(was\s+video\s+baluns\)\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:07:51 -0700
I did some careful measurements of CAT5 cable a few years ago using a 4 port network analyzer (NOT a 2 port VNA with baluns). On my random sample, the characteristic impedance was within 5% of 100 oh
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00086.html (8,444 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:17:58 -0500
That's exactly what I was thinking. 1000' foot spools of flooded Commscope RG-6 are well under $100 shipped, last time I bought some off eBay. That's what I feed my Beverages with. Having said that,
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00087.html (8,640 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: Kevin <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:37:24 -0500
That's why it's rated at 100 meters max distance when used for networking. Now before everybody breaks their fingers posting anecdotal evidence to the contrary I have done the same. It worked out gre
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00089.html (8,680 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeWallner" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 21:12:54 -0400
I did that. I was testing a small dual-feed DHDL loop (-50 dBi gain) using twisted pairs removed from a CAT 5 cable. On the bench the twisted pair showed 100 ohm of impedance and a loss of about 2.8
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00091.html (9,955 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:27:30 -0400
Loss can be mitigated by a preamp at the antenna end. One application would to be to feed multiple Beverages at a hub without a relay box with its isolation problems and intermittents. Carl KM1H -- O
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00093.html (9,425 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:45:28 -0400
For about 7 years Ive run 250' to the trailer at the base of the big tower where it then went another 150' after a router to a microwave Internet link. It was tied to the same bundle carrying all the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00094.html (10,876 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 22:02:47 -0400
Shielded CAT5/6 is readily available. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00095.html (11,524 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:03:17 -0700
I measured 1 dB per 100 feet at 1.8 MHz for my random sample of CAT5. Imagine the loss for 100 Mbit/s data! Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - h
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00096.html (9,629 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:05:15 -0500
Multiple Beverages at the same feedpoint? When I put up my Beverages, I avoided doing that because I read at least one bad experience of someone who tried that. (My Beverage feed points are hundreds
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00098.html (8,955 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:23:38 -0400
I didnt say at the same feedpoint; each CAT5 pair is a seperate feed and then you seperate the actual antenna ends and ground rods the 30-40' as suggested. Thats what I do here and there is a minimum
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00112.html (10,276 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 09:07:58 -0700
Hi George, Thanks for sharing your work on this. Your observations make sense, especially the comment about the coax shield being grounded minimizing common mode. We know that a multi-element common
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00119.html (11,717 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu