Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+VU2BGS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+VU2BGS\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: "Michael Bazley" <bazley@iinet.net.au>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:47:57 +0800; A new VU station on the band... Kumar... on 1833.1 at 2137z 73 Mike VK6HD _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00231.html (6,167 bytes)
2. Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:42:15 -0500; FYI, a Russian friend told me Kumar is running 70 watts to a 10m vertical. We may need some great conditions to hear him, but anything is possible on 160. I worked 8Q7BE a few years ago and he was ru; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00239.html (6,876 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: dl2kq@t-online.de (DL2KQ-EU1TT); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:41:21 +0100; I copy VU2BGS with maximum 449 on 200 m Beverage antenna. But he call CQ without split, and of course on freq was EU zoo :-( 73 de Gary DL2KQ _______________________________________________ Topband m; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00240.html (6,927 bytes)
4. Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 21:38:18 -0500; Wow! The band sounded fairly good tonight at my sunset so I decided to try a few CQ's. I worked about half a dozen EU stations with fairly good signals. I was just finishing a QSO with EA3AKY and was; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00066.html (9,361 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 06:16:49 -0500; VE7SL wrote: Hopefully this is just a taste of what is to come over the next few years. Exactly right Steve...here's what it takes for good conditions on 160: http://sec.noaa.gov/rpc/costello/pkp_15m; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00068.html (7,042 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz; Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:00:55 GMT; Wish I could correlate my openings with Kp, SF, or auroral activity, Bill. Over the last couple of weeks I have had some good days and some hopeless days. Can't find any correlation, positive or neg; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00072.html (6,914 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:10:17 -0500; That's what I always find also. The days I think will be great, nothing happens. I get on when the band is supposed to be wiped out, and signals are booming. As an example Greg, VK3ZL and I have bee; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00075.html (7,957 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: George Taft <W8UVZ@voyager.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:44:54 -0500; Hi Tom I, too, have wondered, what might correlate to the better low band openings. Because of being closer to the auroral oval here in MI, we feel lower A indices are generally better for paths that; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00083.html (9,501 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 06:48:45 -0800; are and BV4CT detect I agree. During the ARRL DX CW contest 2 weeks ago, there were good conditions on Friday night which appeared to correlate with a low K index and quiet auroral zone. VK3ZL was b; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00086.html (8,717 bytes)
10. Topband: VU2BGS (score: 1): Author: "Bill Hohnstein KOHA" <k0ha@navix.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:29:55 -0600; I talked to Kumar, VU2BGS today on 17M and he confirmed what I thought happened--he talked to AA1K and VE1ZZ on 1831 around 0100z on March 8th after working W4ZV on the day before. He said that he'd; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00113.html (7,477 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]