Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+VU2GSM\s+webSDR\s+use\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+VU2GSM\s+webSDR\s+use\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Steve Babcock <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 08:03:12 -0700; I have been "sitting" on this for a few weeks wondering if I should share this information, but after seeing some spots yesterday for VU2GSM on 160m, I decided that others may appreciate it. I know I; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00149.html (11,085 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:23:36 -0500; Hi Steve, I believe it is important to make clear when we are using a distant WebSDR receiver so we do not mislead others to wrong conclusions about propagation conditions nor the performance of thei; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00150.html (12,943 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Paul Mclaren <paul.mcl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:48:04 +0000; Interesting and an explanation why he doesn't respond to my calls from here in NW Europe. I had put it down to poor RX at his end due to high local noise which I guess is part of the reason. Regardin; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00151.html (15,222 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:50:43 -0600; I am under the impression that most contests have rules regarding the proximity of both the transmitter/transmitters and antenna/antennas used for receiving purposes. At the moment I do not believe D; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00152.html (15,435 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:29:50 -0500; No doubt some ops are using WebSDR on receive, but in this case, I am skeptical of the skepticism. Here's why: I routinely work VU2GSM on 40m GL-LP in the early morning hours on a 210-degree bearing; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00153.html (13,380 bytes)
6. Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:57:30 -0800; <Interesting and an explanation why he doesn't respond to my calls from here in NW Europe. I had put it down to poor RX at his end due to high local noise which I guess is part of the reason. <Regard; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00154.html (8,990 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Steve Babcock <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:01:18 -0700; Hi Paul Read the e-mail correspondence from Kanti that I attached to the topband thread. There is no scepticism or uncertainty about weather he is using webSDR. He openly admits it. He admits to usin; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00155.html (16,395 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:27:31 -0500; Steve, Thanks. Word wrap prevented me from opening the file with your e-mail messages but I copied the full URL into my browser and it did open. Possibly he is using WebSDR more on 160m-80m, but from; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00156.html (8,323 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: <JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:24:08 -0500; We may be debating this issue too much IMHO it seems simple using the ARRL DXCC rules: If both the Rx and the Tx are located within the borders of the country (Rx cud be 1000 miles away..), its a val; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00157.html (8,294 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: George Taft via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC); Steve, interesting to a stn that needs VU on 160. I agree and respect your conclusion. With 318 on the TB ball, it is tempting but glad to know the situation. BTW, I'm impressed with your EU QRV. H; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00158.html (12,747 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: kostas sv1dpi <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:18:08 +0200; Unfortunately webSDR are widely used from many hams around the world. I wonder why webSDR owners don't add 5 seconds delay to their software. This way we will have just all the goodies without proble; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00159.html (10,319 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:17:10 -0500; Hi, There are more than moral or ethical issues using WebSDR. The logs I expect to submit (eventually) are for receive-only activity. I see problems netting with signals coming through the WebSDR sta; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00160.html (11,297 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Steve" <VE7SL@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:46:31 -0800; I hope the ARRL issues some guidelines on this subject soon.. Likely a new "DXCC -1/2" Award is already in the works. WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://qsl.net/ve7sl/ VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00161.html (8,450 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:31:23 -0700; There has been some related discussion on the Clublog group. I'm 76 years old (this is my 60th year in ham radio) and two away (SV/A and FR/G) from top of the Honor Roll. I don't think I'll make it; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00162.html (16,252 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:15:20 -0600; Good evening Paul. I cannot speak for your personal remote but I can tell you the rules at RHR: you identify the state (or grid if on FT8 or JT65) of the station from which you are transmitting. Thos; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00163.html (10,891 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:39:45 -0600; It was interesting to observe the EU stations (and a few JA) that used stateside remotes to work the K1N/Navassa operation on TB. It's rather obvious when the din of EU stations is a few db above the; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00164.html (12,435 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:55:09 -0500; Paul, You should check the rules on that WiFi linked beverage. In CQ WW for instance, its not allowed. All RX and TX antennas have to be connected by wires. Some contests - like CQ 160 - allow your s; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00166.html (7,957 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: "John Harden, D.M.D." <jhdmd@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 19:21:52 -0500; I have been watching this scenario since the summer of 1959; it's like service in a combat theater. Nobody plays by the accords of the Geneva Convention. It only matters who is still standing the nex; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00167.html (13,260 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Bob Kupps via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:56:09 +0000 (UTC); Thanks for posting this Steve - much that has been puzzling me is now clear. Remote SDRs, bizarre DXCC "entities", lists, skeds, FT8 etc are why I stopped pursuing awards a long long time ago. But to; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00169.html (12,864 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 19:21:51 -0700; Fortunately, WAS rules are different. If they weren't you could work all states on10 GHz just by driving or flying from state to state. If DXCC worked this way there would be a lot fewer guys on the; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00171.html (9,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]