Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+W1AW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+W1AW\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Ken Claerbout" <K4ZW@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:00:32 -0500; Is it just me or is W1AW's signal on 160 very clicky? I sent them a note a couple of weeks ago. They said they would look into it but left me with the impression that this was the first they had hear; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00109.html (6,869 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:36:13 +0000; Last week, the station manager contacted me for advice to fix the clicks and I sent him instructions for the Omni 6. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing lis; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00110.html (7,517 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: herbs@surfvi.com; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:17:58 -0400; Quoting Ken Claerbout <K4ZW@adelphia.net>: it's time they either fix the problem or suspend their bulletins on Topband until the problem is resolved.> IMO they need to realize that they have wiped ou; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00111.html (7,458 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:44:33 -0500; Even moving to 1800.5 would be an improvement and get them out of the active DX portion of the band. 73/Jon AA1K _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contestin; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00112.html (7,318 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:57:45 EST; IMO they need to realize that they have wiped out so many DX contacts with their automated qrm generator operation over the years. A more prudent approach for them would be to move up to 1990KHz or s; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00113.html (7,482 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:10:51 -0500; I sent them a it but left me with it. Has anyone time they either fix the problem is They've been in exchanges with me and others off and on for years now. I think they have been working on it. Some; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00114.html (9,366 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:47:33 -0500; issues including indicated hostility from the 160 added recently he was window. Oh, I see. 1.) A director gets flack because they do nothing about a narrow mode segment and the problems the lack of; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00115.html (8,131 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:50:54 -0500; out of the active DX portion of the band. But that would be illegal. The rule is no part of any emission related to modulation of a transmitter can extend outside the authorized band. It doesn't say; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00116.html (7,925 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:44:48 EST; Did I follow that correctly? Or did I miss something? Who was that director? 73 Tom I think you have it Tom.. The Director is N2FF, Frank Fallon. He is otherwise a good guy, a very active ham as oppo; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00117.html (7,730 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "George Taft" <w8uvz@voyager.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:54:04 -0500; Hi Jon I proposed we suggest an alternate freq for them if we could agree to which one. I have the ear of my Great Lakes Director K8JE if we want to make a group effort. 73 George W8UVZ _____________; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00119.html (8,390 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:58:15 -0500; 1840 would make a nice band-edge marker perhaps to alert the SSB guys they are sliding too low. But they might also cover up some DX there. 1800.5 would have little impact on DX, still comply with th; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00122.html (8,178 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:17:28 -0600; ...snip... I would be happy to bend the ear of Dakota Director Jay Bellows-K0QB on the subject. Jay has been a good advocate on many issues and I'm certain he would be receptive to any notion that wo; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00123.html (8,240 bytes)
13. Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:30:57 -0400; Is W1AW missing from 160 now? I use them to calibrate directions. _______________________________________________ Remember the PreStew coming on October 20th. http://www.kkn.net/stew for more info.; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00213.html (6,330 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:30:45 -0400 (EDT); I have been looking for them for the past week and I too have not heard w1aw on 160. Even did a search on internet trying to find out why but could not find info. Is W1AW missing from 160 now? I use; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00214.html (6,833 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:18:24 -0400 (EDT); W8JI asked : "Is W1AW missing from 160 now? I use them to calibrate directions." I just checked with the ARRL, and the 160 meter antenna was damaged in a storm and they have been off the air for abou; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00216.html (7,151 bytes)
16. Topband: W1AW (score: 1): Author: "Jim Monahan" <K1PX@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:36:44 -0400; I was in contact with Joe Garcia, W1AW station manager, about not being on the air on 160 meters. This is his response: "Yes, we've not been on 160 meters for about a week or so. It's not by choice.; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00218.html (7,180 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]