- 1. Topband: WPX (score: 1)
- Author: rmread@attglobal.net (Bob Marshall-Read)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:26:19 +0100
- Topbanders, Well, either nobody from W/VE operated or we had no prop from here! NB1B and VE1ZZ were the only two worked, heard AA4MM, but splatter from an OT (5 KHz or more all weekend) made that one
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00135.html (8,050 bytes)
- 2. Topband: WPX (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:56:34 -0500
- Hi Bob, The band was active and there were good signals from Europe. Unfortunately, as in most SSB contests, many US operators with poor receiving conditions (they couldn't even hear the locals calli
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00138.html (7,397 bytes)
- 3. Topband: WPX (score: 1)
- Author: otterstad@enter.vg (ragnar otterstad)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:53:25 +0200
- G4VGO: IMHO: 160 is not really suited for a phone contest at all. I listen around and never have I heard so many stations overmodulating, spreading distorted signals all over etc. The CW portion was
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00140.html (7,220 bytes)
- 4. Topband: WPX (score: 1)
- Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:51:08 +0200
- If WPX would count mults by band or at least add countries to pfx mults, the band would be surely much more active than generally is during this contest. Any all band entry, MM apart, can infact skip
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00141.html (7,388 bytes)
- 5. SV: Topband: WPX (score: 1)
- Author: lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:30:24 +0200
- Tom, Your personal rule is very honorable and I agree with you to 100% ! 73 de Lars/SM3BDZ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/topband Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requ
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00142.html (6,801 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu