Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Wellbrook\s+receive\s+loop\s+performance\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:05:28 -0600
Somebody mentioned getting on Top Band to see how his new Wellbrook loop was working - wonder if that person is lurking about and can comment on how it performed. That antenna sure seems to be gettin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00000.html (6,061 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: "la5he@otterstad.dk" <la5he@otterstad.dk>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 03:31:23 -0400
Somebody mentioned getting on Top Band to see how his new Wellbrook loop was working - wonder if that person is lurking about and can comment on how it performed. That antenna sure seems to be gettin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00065.html (7,581 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Dave G4GED <radiodave.g4ged@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:52:20 +0100
Well my homebrew 2m diameter 160m mag loop outperforms my ALA-1530 Wellbrook Loop on TB every time. It often beats my Bevs also! Dave _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ...
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00066.html (7,211 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:56:05 +0200
Hi Dave, Can you please elaborate a bit more on your 2m dia 160m loop? 73 Mark, PA5MW _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00067.html (7,268 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:18:55 -0400
And please elaborate on the list. 73, Bill KU8H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00068.html (8,002 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:27:55 -0700
And comparisons on the list with the Pixel loop would also be welcome. Shortwave Magnetic Loop Antenna (Model: RF PRO-1B) | Pixel Technologies Steve WB6RSE ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00071.html (8,007 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:30:39 -0700
And comparisons on the list with the Pixel loop would also be welcome. http://www.pixelsatradio.com/product/shortwave-magnetic-loop-antenna/ Steve WB6RSE _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00072.html (8,119 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:52:26 +0100
Rag LA5HE wrote on April 9, "I put one up last autum and have compared it with my Titanex V160HD . At this quiet location I had to realise that nothing was gained, which was a disappointment ! 73 Rag
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00073.html (8,673 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
How well does this antenna perform in a City environment like mine on top of a 50 foot tower?   Stay on course, fight a good fight, and keep the faith. Jim K9TF/WA9YSD _______________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00075.html (7,950 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: joe <galicic@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:07:14 -0400
I am experimenting with a small one meter square loop. It is 5 turns of with 50 ohm coax. Using air variable cap to resonate the 5 turn loop. I have it setup in my basement on a tripod with small TV
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00077.html (9,252 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: joe <galicic@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:49:20 -0400
I am experimenting with a small one meter square loop. It is 5 turns of with 50 ohm coax. Using air variable cap to resonate the 5 turn loop. I have it setup in my basement on a tripod with small TV
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00078.html (8,989 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:51:41 -0400
When you say quieter, is that comparing signal to noise on a common signal, or just listening to the level of noise raw from the two antennas? 73, Guy _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00079.html (9,608 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: joe <galicic@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:04:33 -0400
I built it in one evening using two pieces of scrap 1x3 lumber for spreaders. I pounded in four large wire staples to hold the wire to the spreaders and threaded both loops through them. The five wir
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00080.html (10,332 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: joe <galicic@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:14:02 -0400
I made some signal to noise measurements last night between my short BOG and LOOP. Local (100-300 miles away) cw signals. The Loop, which is still living in my basement, is within 3DB of the BOG. I w
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00081.html (11,365 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: BP Veal <bryonveal@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:43:39 -0600
Dave, This is a great topic as there are a lot of us on small lots active on topband needing what ever edge we can find....... Do you have this loop you've designed published where we can see it? I k
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00082.html (9,114 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:23:05 -0400
A comparison of the Wellbrook product which is a magnetic loop is not a good one to a AY loop or other low angle directive receive antenna. Mag loops are not "directive" in the same way they only hav
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00083.html (10,440 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:24:06 -0400
BCB work would be good for the Wellbrook and I suspect that is their target market. Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00084.html (11,934 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:34:58 -0400
surrounded by 100+ other units making electronic noise and the poor owner is trying to hear something on his $59 allband Chinese toy. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00085.html (13,496 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
W2PM said, "A comparison of the Wellbrook product which is a magnetic loop is not a good one to a AY loop or other low angle directive receive antenna. Mag loops are not "directive" in the same way t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00086.html (12,021 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:18:43 -0700
Nice for nulling strong local point source noise but that's it. It will enable qsos not possible otherwise and some DX I suppose but Wellbrook is not a good choice for any serious DX work. No mag ant
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00090.html (10,124 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu