Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+is\s+best\s+for\s+copying\s+the\s+weakest\s+DX\s+\-\s+DSP\s+or\s+the\s+ear\-brain\s+combo\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+is\s+best\s+for\s+copying\s+the\s+weakest\s+DX\s+\-\s+DSP\s+or\s+the\s+ear\-brain\s+combo\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:39:25 -0500; I'd like to know whether it's ever been established that some very talented hams can out-hear the best SDRs and/or DSP available. Can a skilled ear-brain combo (such as some highly-skilled and talent; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00008.html (7,766 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:25:08 -0400; Mike, Are you referring to a specific modulation mode? How about adjacent channel interference issues? I like your question. Art On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> wrote; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00009.html (8,634 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:01:41 -0400; Although I don't consider myself among the "highly-skilled and talented", I can't think of an instance where DSP made the difference between making a contact or not. I do have an Autek QF-1A wired in; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00010.html (10,436 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:10:48 -0400; CW skimmer is very impressive to see in action. But nowhere as good as an average CW contester at picking callsigns from the noise. Tim N3QE _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00011.html (9,589 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:14:47 -0500; No, I'm not; but I was thinking of CW first and SSB second. How about adjacent channel interference issues? Let's assume for now that there is none. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00012.html (8,564 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Greg Zenger <n2gz@gregzenger.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:26:58 -0400; I suspect a well trained and practiced brain may be able to out perform a DSP assisted average brain... However over the course of a contest (24-48 hours of [near] continuous operating) a DSP assiste; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00013.html (11,753 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 01:27:50 -0500; Some years ago, a few of us would occasionally have QSOs that we called "Martin Luthers" -as in "I had a DREAM last night!" and we'd send off the QSLs and would often get one back! This was especiall; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00014.html (12,444 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Kinzli N6GQ <jeff@n6gq.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:00:58 -0700; So, this isn't a scientific test, but a number of years ago (pre-K3) I built an Elecraft K2 (great fun to build) and then built the DSP board for it as well. As a relatively experienced ear, and alwa; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00015.html (11,001 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:58:48 -0400; I'd like to know whether it's ever been established that some very talented hams can out-hear the best SDRs and/or DSP available. Can a skilled ear-brain combo (such as some highly-skilled and talent; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00020.html (10,101 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:35:23 -0700; And - do not underestimate the ability of your brain to act as a CW "filter". When I was doing EME on six meters (using CW) - I found using SSB bandwidths made it easier to copy the weak signal. You; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00021.html (10,794 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 11:58:10 -0400; N2GZ identifies fatigue is an important issue. A sort of acoustical psychosis sets in if you listen to a static crashy band with the same narrow filter for hours at a time. One advantage of having mu; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00023.html (14,717 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]