Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+is\s+most\s+important\s+RX\s+parameter\s+against\s+lighting\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+is\s+most\s+important\s+RX\s+parameter\s+against\s+lighting\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Which is most important RX parameter against lighting? (score: 1): Author: "LY2IJ" <ly2ij@qrz.lt>; Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:46:19 +0300; Blocking? Dynamic range? Something other? Nothing helps? This question rose after WPX weekend on TB with constant lighting all around including ?real video and audio? (and following rainbow). Killer; /archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00084.html (7,108 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Which is most important RX parameter against lighting? (score: 1): Author: "Raoul Coetzee" <raoulc@smmcape.co.za>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:00:09 +0200; I am afraid you will have to sell your current receiver to get rid of the noise.You could remove the antenna as well, but you will be temted to try it again and then the static will return! :=) If y; /archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00085.html (7,431 bytes)
3. Topband: Which is most important RX parameter against lighting? (score: 1): Author: "D Andersen" <w7dddd@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:43:52 -0700; I think the tools that help with lightning include; of them. They provide azimuth and elevation rejection. Since lightning is usually from a higher angle than DX the elevation rejection is very impor; /archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00086.html (7,802 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]