Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Working\s+dupes\s+on\s+a\s+band\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: "Pete Rimmel N8PR" <n8pr@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:16:49 -0500
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with working the same station on the same band more than once. We used to do it all the time to assure we had "insurance" contacts with someone we needed for DXC
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00010.html (11,939 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg@mksat.net
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:35:38 +0200
Hi The main pleasure not DXCC. We love good and various propagation! Nick, UY0ZG _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00011.html (12,794 bytes)

3. Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:31:26 -0500
It would be a very boring hobby if you only ever worked a given station ONCE . . . To me, the hobby is all about having regular contacts - it's how you make friends ! And that's the same whether it's
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00013.html (6,897 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: Michael Armstrong via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:34:31 -0700
AB7ZU Mike Armstrong has passed Can we remove him from this group please Thank you, the XYL US Navy - What a wild, and fabulous, ride! Can I go again? ;) _________________ Topband Reflector Archives
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00014.html (8,096 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: JL PFIRMAN <w3to76@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:52:04 -0500 (EST)
My first post here,but read all the posts every day in fact look forward to it! My feelings exactly Pete and might I add ,there are still gentlemen on topband.This am at 1215z I was able to copy and
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00016.html (13,821 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:15:37 -0800 (PST)
Hi guys, I see nothing wrong with working someone you have had more than one contact with before. At least as long as there are not people trying to work an ATNO. But that is where my rub comes from.
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00018.html (18,914 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 15:55:23 -0700
If you are a DX station please call me no matter how many times we have worked before. Its nice to know the band is open and that I am not calling CQ into a dark void. Yes the RBN helps but there is
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00020.html (18,812 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: <JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:37:50 -0500
You guys shud try FT8 on 160..DX stations hear and decode everybody at the same time no QRM !! They then just work their way down the list...nobody interferes with anybody else everybody gets a chanc
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00021.html (7,763 bytes)

9. Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:43:38 -0500
Sorry Jay . . . but not in a million years ! That's exactly what I wanted to get away from . . . My suggestion of having a 160m DX Activity night every Wednesday was to get people on the band to have
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00022.html (7,935 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: WT2P - CJ Johnson <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:46:26 -0600
I am in the process of building my first ever BOG (NE/SW) and hope to be more active on 160. Wednesdays right after the 0300Z CWT's are perfect, since I end CWT's on 160 anyhow. This is the first sea
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00023.html (8,714 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: <JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:53:31 -0500
Wow Roger I didnt know digital QSOs were IMPROPER....welcome to the 21st century...jay --ny2ny _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00024.html (7,131 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 19:20:53 -0500
The FT8 QSOs may be "proper" for a computer. Just not for a human. 73 Ed N1UR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00025.html (7,702 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:35:01 -0700
Actually, there is QRM.  In fact I gave up FT8 after about a hundred Qs  after trying to work a nameless west African who started getting clobbered mid QSO. I just kept repeating reports hoping that
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00026.html (8,718 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Working dupes on a band (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hjelmström <sm6cvx@hjelmstrom.se>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 08:53:28 +0100
Hi Roger Agree 100%. Also for me ,,,FT8 and JT65 is NOT a Ham radio QSO.As I see it. Its computer talking to a computer without human help. NEVER from me either. BUT these people that enjoy FT8 aso a
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00029.html (9,030 bytes)

15. Topband: Working Dupes on a Band (score: 1)
Author: k8gg@voyager.net
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:06:03 -0500 (EST)
Fellow Topbanders: Sometimes I hear a DX station calling CQ and no one else calling. I think it is good practice to let them know they are getting out, no matter how many times I have logged them bef
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00042.html (7,803 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu