Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+XR0ZRC\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+XR0ZRC\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:00:16 +0000; I am a bit puzzled by XR0ZRC. I thought they were going to have a major effort on 80 and 160, but so far I have heard from little to none from them on 160. (I am not on 80 M) Last night, 26th UTC, I; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00115.html (8,998 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:17:57 -0700; I have heard XR0ZRC the past two evenings on 160. Agreed they are not hearing very well at all - as they had a rather large pileup of both USA and EU stations calling (and yes VA2WA) and very few wer; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00116.html (10,459 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:21:19 -0400; David, some stats from Clublog below: In 2013, XR0ZR made a major 160M effort, in South American summer: 160: 1050 Q's 80: 2374 Q's 40: 4579 Q's I think it's unreasonable to expect that every single; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00117.html (9,694 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: "ok1tn " <ok1tn@seznam.cz>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:26:42 +0100 (CET); XR0ZRC the signal in Eu is strong but listening is reduced by strong interference from the lights of the port. ok1tn -- 73 Slavek Zeler https://www.okdxf.eu/ "Telegraph Key Collector". In 2013, XR0ZR; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00118.html (10,402 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:32:28 -0300; David, You would need a Beverage for XR0WRC favoring the south to SSW from your location. Herb, KV4FZ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00119.html (9,173 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:13:21 +0000; Herb, I have a dedicated beverage aimed at 180 degrees and it works great. Nice and quiet and about 900 ft long. I do not have anything for Bouvet at 140 degrees or so. I better get to work! Dave Her; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00120.html (10,124 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:37:23 -0400; The big difference, as I recall, between XR0ZR and XR0ZRC is the timing. ZR was in November, a month that was better for all concerned with regard to QRN as their 160 total demonstrates. 73, Ken - K4; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00121.html (12,010 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:55:27 -0300; Ken, I will gladly attest to that as XR0ZR was work here from 160-6 all modes including RTTY with pipeline condition. I even work them on 6 meters 6 different times when we had time to chit chat and; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00122.html (13,151 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:05:15 -0400; Yes, Herb, and I'm afraid that the Bouvet expedition is going to have similar QRN problems. Fingers crossed! 73, Ken - K4XL -- Ken - K4XL BoatAnchor Manual Archive BAMA - http://bama.edebris.com ____; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00123.html (14,878 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:16:40 -0400; Im not sure why they wont try 160 closer to their sunrise.....every morning they are on 80, and lately have been begging, with good signals, and seem to hear ok on 80, but their rate is slow due to n; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00124.html (10,498 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:18:59 -0700; They were on 80 and 160 at the same time last night. Tree _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00125.html (11,015 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:22:27 -0400; Point is, why not try 160 in early morning, prior to their sunrise... Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00126.html (11,356 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: wa8wzg@wa8wzg.net; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:47:20 -0600; I spent 3 hours last night listen and trying to work XR0.. when they were decent copy IN AZ about 0400,, when there were Many NA, stations calling along with a lot of Eu,, but VERY few made it into t; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00127.html (12,628 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:14:12 +0000 (UTC); I worked 3G0Z in 2001. It was a six-meters only DXpedition. They had two stations operating then. One was located in a local's house located on the western shore of San Juan Bautista and the other wa; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00128.html (14,548 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Childers K9CQ" <k9cq@k9cq.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:05:02 -0500; That is not the problem here in the Midwest Paul. Every band I have worked XR0ZRC, they have been loud even on TB. All of the other bands they seemed to have no problems hearing stations to work exce; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00131.html (14,924 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 19:37:38 +0000; IMHO. Not just one but several Dxpeditions recently have had what seems like vacation style operating while promoted as full time full efforts. Some from hotels and resorts and some from less comfort; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00132.html (8,811 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:30:48 -0700; I was copying them last night on 160 about Q4 through the static crashes, but judging by the size of the pileup on the panadaper screen and their widely known receiving problems I didn't bother to ca; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00133.html (9,697 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: XR0ZRC? (score: 1): Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:26:16 +0000 (UTC); Hi all, I started calling them around 0315z when they were peaking S9. That's very loud considering the beverage has no noise. Using all of my learned skills I just could not work them. I was using t; /archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00135.html (11,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]