Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+adding\s+another\s+inverted\s+l\s+to\s+the\s+existing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+adding\s+another\s+inverted\s+l\s+to\s+the\s+existing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: adding another inverted l to the existing (score: 1): Author: james soto via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:32:40 +0000 (UTC); Actually iam using an inverted L for 160 with few radials.I would like to build another one for 75 meters band. my questio are:1. How close they could be? 2. could i use the same radials existing fro; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00021.html (7,207 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: adding another inverted l to the existing (score: 1): Author: Greg Zenger <n2gz@gregzenger.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:00:48 -0500; I have a 80m free standing 1/4 vertical on 80m, over 60x 65' radials. A coil between the feed-point and the radial plate matches the antenna. Large ferrite beads were added to the feed-line at the fe; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00024.html (8,963 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: adding another inverted l to the existing (score: 1): Author: Gert Meinen <pa3aav@hetnet.nl>; Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:46:08 +0100; James, You can add another inverted L in the same plane as the 160m one. If you keep 'm seperated 1 or 2 meters they 'll work great, they don' t "see" each other. You can put 'm on the same feedpoint; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00027.html (7,254 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: adding another inverted l to the existing (score: 1): Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:06:58 -0500; Hi Jimmy, Perhaps another solution could be to add an 80m (coaxial) trap to the 160m inverted L. I used this approach when I lived on a small city lot in SC with only a single useful tree. This allow; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00046.html (8,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]