Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+alternative\s+to\s+vacuum\s+variables\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:33:58 -0500
One of the reasons I have mot gone to high power on 160 is the cost of capacitors for my omega match - at least $300. Anyone know of any workable alternative? I remember someone writing about using c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00183.html (6,961 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:30:22 -0500
Pete, I used a big 300pf breadslicer with somewhere in the 7.5 to 9KV range ( I forget the spacing, it was a vintage Johnson) and a couple of 857 size ceramic caps for my Omega at a prior QTH. Smalle
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00188.html (9,000 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:39:41 -0800
Making capacitors out of coax seems like an easy solution, however they end up being fairly lossy due to copper loss. Think about it: you would not deliberately make a capacitor long and skinny. The
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00189.html (7,676 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:28:21 -0500
One way around this is to use multiple shorter sections in parallel. One can also use series/parallel arrangements of fixed "doorknob" capacitors to obtain the necessary voltage/current rating to pa
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00190.html (9,334 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:59:23 -0500
One of the reasons I have mot gone to high power on 160 is the cost of capacitors for my omega match - at least $300. Anyone know of any workable alternative? I remember someone writing about using c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00191.html (9,271 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:14:01 -0500
information? Yes, there is a great solution, I'm using it for almost 10 years. The issue with capacitors in 160m is the dielectric an most capacitors get hot and change the capacitance. I used 19 x 6
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00192.html (9,163 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:42:39 -0500
Hi Pete, I've used a short length of RG-58 coax for just that purpose in one application here, to supplement the "C" from my air variable at the base of one of my extended inverted "L's"... There's n
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00193.html (8,729 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:30:37 -0500
Thanks, Tom. I thought I recalled this advice from an earlier reflector post, but couldn't find it. Thanks also to everyone elsewho replied, and the many interesting ideas My single 97-foot tower has
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00195.html (10,572 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:23:24 -0500
Using a thicker wire, or multiple wires in a drop, always helps. Last single thin wire I used was around 1970. :-) Thanks, Tom. I thought I recalled this advice from an earlier reflector post, but co
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00198.html (10,301 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:00:37 -0500
Yes, there is a great solution, I'm using it for almost 10 years. The issue with capacitors in 160m is the dielectric an most capacitors get hot and change the capacitance. I used 19 x 62 pFNPO 3KV c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00200.html (10,920 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:21:30 -0500
Yes, there is a great solution, I'm using it for almost 10 years. The issue with capacitors in 160m is the dielectric an most capacitors get hot and change the capacitance. I used 19 x 62 pFNPO 3KV c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00208.html (11,742 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:45:06 -0500
I don't know much antenna theory, ask me something regarding human biology & I might be a better authority. However, back when I lived in IL in the early 90's, I used to have a tower and not enough s
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00213.html (9,471 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1)
Author: "Lloyd Berg - N9LB" <lloydberg@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:24:02 -0600
I've tried doorknob caps, they get hot, drift and I've had a couple explode! I've used air variables, they work well until a bug crawls between the plates. I finally gave up and went with vacuum vari
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00216.html (9,316 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu