Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+coax\s+change\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+coax\s+change\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: coax change? (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:25:13 -0500; I am in need of new coax. I have a run of 350' to my transmitting antenna (Inv L) and my K9ay is 200' away from the shack. The coax to the L is RG-213 and the coax to the K9AY is 75 ohm TV coax. I ne; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00180.html (7,374 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: coax change? (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:34:55 -0500; You need to run the numbers for the highest band you expect to be using. You talking about using 20m or 10m? It's hard to make a case for LMR 500 on 160m at amateur power levels. 73, Guy. __________; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00182.html (7,524 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: coax change? (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:20:19 -0500; Well, The way the bands have been as of late, I don't hear much happening on 20 or 10. I did mention using the higher bands as when the low bands turn poorly during the summer I'll turn upwards for; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00185.html (9,440 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: coax change? (score: 1): Author: Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:56:29 -0600; I would not think you could really notice a difference in DB at HF. the LMR 400 is a good bet, High velocity, low loss. I've seen this surplus for much less than the going retail rate. Another benifi; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00187.html (10,425 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]