Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+decoupling\s+Inv\s+L\s+for\s+loop\s+on\s+Rx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+decoupling\s+Inv\s+L\s+for\s+loop\s+on\s+Rx\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: decoupling Inv L for loop on Rx (score: 1): Author: John Randall via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:19:05 +0000 (UTC); Reading through the latest batch of emails, I realised that I may have to decouple my INV L antenna on Rx sothat I can rx on my loop. The loop will be on a 10ft pole appox 20ft from the INV L, so the; /archives//html/Topband/2018-03/msg00032.html (8,461 bytes)
2. Topband: decoupling Inv L for loop on Rx (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:19:11 -0500; I found I had to put a relay in the feedline to my inverted L to completely open the line on rx. Your typical "coax relay" only opens the center conductor. Fortunately on 160 m. an open frame relay t; /archives//html/Topband/2018-03/msg00060.html (7,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]