Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+easy\s+WAS\s+topband\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+easy\s+WAS\s+topband\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: easy WAS topband? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:39:01 -0500; Can't help but hitchhike on N5IA's thread about arrl being an easy WAS on 160. Just back from the W2GD coastal site, former WSC marine stn. We didn't get a sweep. Missed AK, and two provinces. I know; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00019.html (7,858 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: easy WAS topband? (score: 1): Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:43:24 -0500 (EST); I too must make remarks. Topband WAS during this contest would have been very hard from here--I felt the band was rather flat and the general noise level was high. As to "how" easy 160 WAS can be, it; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00046.html (8,013 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: easy WAS topband? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:42:21 -0800; It certainly isn't easy from the opposite coast either. I managed it, however, both W1OP and me working HARD to complete the exchange for RI at 5am EST, and having N0MJ answer my CQ only an hour or t; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00050.html (7,567 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]