Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+high\s+power\s+lowpass\s+filter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+high\s+power\s+lowpass\s+filter\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: high power lowpass filter (score: 1): Author: "Dick" <knaap159@zonnet.nl>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:54:15 +0100; Well thanks for the comments! So, likely I have to choose a low pass filter, I guess. I suppose the advantage is that the capacitors have lower voltages on them, compaired with combinations of parall; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00235.html (6,497 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: high power lowpass filter (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:38:48 -0800 (PST); You can look at the schematics for the Intech COM-1000 amplifier on my web site (www.n6rk.com). Although it is very conservatively rated at 1 kW, I run it at 1.5 kW all the time. I reverse engineered; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00238.html (7,463 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]