Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+inverted\s+l\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+inverted\s+l\s*$/: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: INVERTED L (score: 1): Author: magoo@isp.on.ca (Mr. Magoo); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 07:25:10 -0400; I heard that 5K0Z was to be on 160M the past couple of days but had no 160M antenna here at the summer home. I installed an inverted L alongside and in parallel with my 80/40 vertical and gave it a t; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00132.html (6,773 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: bogyo@ph.debrecen.hu (Bogyo Istvan); Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:28:48 +0100; Dear Fellow TopBanders, My 30 meter tall vertical came down on Friday in a storm - second time this season. I spent most of Saturday and Sunday re-building the radiator. I decided to give up bottom l; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00199.html (7,344 bytes)
3. TopBand: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: kf6ham@juno.com (Russell A Scofield); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 21:21:20 EST; Thanks for all of your suggestions. I cut the length to 170 feet +/- and have a dinky radial system. It seems to work real well! I plan to improve the radial system and add a series air-variable cap; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00022.html (6,893 bytes)
4. TopBand: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Mike Michon); Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 06:45:08 -0600; Dear Antenna Experimenters, My inverted L is 90 feet horizontal, and 75 feet vertical. Tha autek analyzer says it is resonant at 1.6 mhz. I have 12 verticals of varying length, from 75-130 feet as we; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00442.html (7,384 bytes)
5. TopBand: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Mike Michon); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 23:21:51 -0600; Many thanks to all the replies about the antenna question. It was a good day. Got the amplifier running, about 700 watts output. The antenna was a breeze thanks to all the good advice. I fooled aroun; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00470.html (7,047 bytes)
6. TopBand: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 09:28:04 -0500; --IMA.Boundary.795803878 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Mike etc: It would be good to check the temperature of the 5; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00473.html (8,032 bytes)
7. TopBand: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Leif.L.Hammarstrom@telia.se (Leif.L.Hammarstrom@telia.se); Date: Fri, 27 Sep 96 09:25:05 +0200; --openmail-part-020491eb-00000001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="Inverted" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 73, Leif SM5BFJ --openmail-part-020491eb-00000001 Content-Type: applica; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00232.html (24,670 bytes)
8. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Gregg Seidl <k9kl@direcway.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:44:54 -0600; Wow thanks for all the help on my questions about the inv L.I have sent off for a copy of the "DXing on the edge" and ON4UN's book as well.Sorry I can't email to all those who replied but I read ever; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00103.html (6,360 bytes)
9. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: K7lay@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:56:18 EDT; Hi Evan Last fall was also my first time on 160 since 1960. My results were 37 countries (36 confirmed) and 41 states (all conf). Most through the contests. Best dx from Port Orchard, Washington- D4b; /archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00012.html (7,314 bytes)
10. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: crisdol@tiscali.co.uk; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:22:36 +0000; Greetings all Have recently moved into a new place with lotsa space. In the last few days I worked VK and a couple of W7s on a dipole at 40ft (albeit in excellent condx), and am now getting very inte; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00239.html (8,333 bytes)
11. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:45:41 -0800 (PST); 1. Yes, in general... However the 3/8 moves the current lobe up the wire... So, lessened ground heating may offset the change in the main angle of radiation... Try it at a quarter wave until you have; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00243.html (8,600 bytes)
12. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: crisdol@tiscali.co.uk; Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:29 +0000; Greetings all Just wanna say a HUGE THANK-YOU for the responses. I am very grateful for all opinions expressed - and will try to respond in the coming days to each of you who have shared your wisdom.; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00253.html (6,995 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Dudley Chapman" <chief@thechief.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:36:47 -0500; Cris, When radials are on or very near the ground, they act more like distributed capacitance to ground rather than like a tuned element. So it's not necessary to tune them to any particular length.; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00260.html (9,202 bytes)
14. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Ron <sparkrohan@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:09:46 -0800 (PST); Any recommendations re adding 80m to an existing 160m inverted L? Would it be better to: 1) insert a coax trap 2) Tue the antenna at the base (LC network)? My concerns are if the coax trap will decre; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00023.html (6,795 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:00:56 -0500; Would it be better to: I impedance match it at the base, it will be a 1/4 on 160 and 1/2 wave on 80m. The problem there being 1/2 wave verticals usually are asociated with line radiation problems. Ro; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00025.html (7,602 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Ron <sparkrohan@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:48:01 -0800 (PST); Thanks for all the fine input, gentlemen. BTW, my inv L trails down along a simple pipe mast. It is about 45' vertical and slopes away from the mast, at a slight angle. The horizontal is tied to a ne; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00026.html (7,425 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:49:06 -0600; from Ron, 4S7RO: Ron, It is possible to install a separate 80M 1/4-wave wire at the same feedpoint to make a "parallel" or "fan" vertical. To make it work properly, the two wires should be separated; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00027.html (7,476 bytes)
18. Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Jwpjj@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:25:58 EST; Hopefully I can use this forum for questions about antennas for the Top Band. I recently installed a 160 meter inverted L, Its about 130' , vertical height is 60' , horizontal length 70'. The horizon; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00014.html (7,740 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:58:53 -0500; "...I have at present 4 - 130' radials attached... Question is, without involving "Murphy", is if I add more radials will the vswr change in that I might have to shorten the antenna, will me signal s; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00017.html (9,763 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:15:30 +0000; John, SWR is not the best criterion for determining the optimum number of radials. In fact if your impedance is 50ohms and no reactance you still have a lot of ground losses. I have a very similar an; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00018.html (7,421 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]