Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+lightning\s+protection\s+on\s+4\s+sq\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+lightning\s+protection\s+on\s+4\s+sq\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: lightning protection on 4 sq (score: 1): Author: "Allan Greening" <vk3pa@vk3pa.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:58:50 +1000 (EST); I carn't see why not just use 1/4 wave shorted stubs at each vertical ??this would blead static es lighten to gnd!es not effect the delay lines! also on this is it ok to use a coax impedance other th; /archives//html/Topband/2008-06/msg00023.html (6,683 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: lightning protection on 4 sq (score: 1): Author: "Harold Smith" <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:35:16 -0500; Allan: I don't believe that lightning will even know that a shorted stub is connected. The resistance will be a couple of ohms. One need resistance in the milliohms. A Super Conductor at absolute ze; /archives//html/Topband/2008-06/msg00027.html (7,758 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: lightning protection on 4 sq (score: 1): Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:25:27 -0500; Shorted quarter wave stubs are fine for bleeding off static but not very effective for lightning protection. 73. . .Dave W0FLS _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Top; /archives//html/Topband/2008-06/msg00032.html (8,023 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]