Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+modeling\s+BOGs\s+$or\s+whatever\s+we\s+call\s+them$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+modeling\s+BOGs\s+$or\s+whatever\s+we\s+call\s+them$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: modeling BOGs (or whatever we call them) (score: 1): Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 16:40:38 -0400; With the recent thread of modeling BOGs, I hope those interested in this endeavor read Rudy N6LF's article in the June 2016 QST. In the article he compared modeling to measurements on three antennas:; /archives//html/Topband/2016-05/msg00030.html (7,314 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: modeling BOGs (or whatever we call them) (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:47:14 -0500; I don't have the June issue of QST yet. I couldn't wait, so I went to the ARRL website to read it, hoping for some enlightenment. It is unfortunate that most of his measurements were done on a buried; /archives//html/Topband/2016-05/msg00031.html (9,562 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: modeling BOGs (or whatever we call them) (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 11:00:00 -0500; I sent this message to K9LA, then it occurred to me that maybe I should sent it to the group also. So here it is. I agree that BOGs are not well understood. What started this whole process of compari; /archives//html/Topband/2016-05/msg00032.html (8,868 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: modeling BOGs (or whatever we call them) (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 14:08:31 -0500; Hi Jerry, Thanks for sharing this. But I thought that it was a well-established fact that NO antenna modeling software does well with antennas close to the ground. Modeling ground loss or wires close; /archives//html/Topband/2016-05/msg00033.html (8,175 bytes)
5. Topband: modeling BOGs (or whatever we call them) (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:56:46 -0400; Running way, way, way behind in responses to postings. Getting hopefully well-thought-out responses the same day or even the same week or month is apparently not always going to happen. Short Version; /archives//html/Topband/2016-06/msg00012.html (17,313 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]