- 1. Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@radiusnorth.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:16:38 -0500
- Can we stop over posting like I have done. I get the digest and this drives me crazy. Ok. I have taken another swig of coffee and am calmer. :-) Please? 73 Craig Send Topband mailing list submissions
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00261.html (40,904 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:07:55 -0600
- With due respect, I guess I have never understood the logic of "bottom posting" (and perhaps I'm missing something). The entire business and email world overpost (and for good reason). . . no one wan
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00269.html (51,343 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:20:47 +0000
- I think Craig's point is that overposting to a digest email causes you to repost the entire digest. In this case bottom posting would hopefully force the poster to edit out the extraneous digest text
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00270.html (7,732 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:22:03 -0800
- I think it is important for people to realize that not everyone reads topband postings the same as everyone else. (hold on - I have to delete the rest of this message which includes all of the stuff
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00271.html (7,550 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:08:21 -0800
- Nothing FORCES you to repost the entire message (or the digest). It takes LAZINESS and STUPIDITY to do that. I've used several email programs, and while some insisted on copying the entire message,
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00272.html (8,608 bytes)
- 6. Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:40:26 -0600
- Totally uncalled for! Tree, I know it is a lot of work on your part, but think it would be a good idea for it to be moderated. 73...Stan, K5GO _______________________________________________ 160 met
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00273.html (7,339 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:21:00 -0700
- With no intention of being offensive to you Stan -- The saying is, "Nothing is impossible for the person who does not have to do it". A little mental effort and some polite reminders by members on th
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00276.html (8,048 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:36:38 -0800
- Huh? Did you miss this post from our moderator? I'd call it long overdue. 73, Jim K9YC = = = = = = = = = So - Topband list. I am disappointed. Here is one message I have in my inbox this morng: -- Go
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00277.html (9,111 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:43:49 -0500
- I disagree. Moderated lists are moderated for a reason. The moderation allows outright rejection of things that will just stir up a flurry of activity, angry or poorly though out responses, or that
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00278.html (8,540 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: overposting (score: 1)
- Author: Keith Jillings G3OIT <keith.g3oit@jillings.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:59:56 +0000
- Indeed! As someone who moderated a list for several years, it's not a job to be undertaken lightly - unless there's a team of several mods. You worry about going on vacation, or being away for a whil
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00283.html (8,023 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu