Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+phasing\s+line\s+lengths\s+for\s+phased\s+verticals\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Until recently, I had phased verticals on both 80m and 160m and lots of beverages. (this was in a woods, and not my property)  Then the loggers came and destroyed all. In addition to the antennas, th
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00281.html (7,818 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:18:53 -0500
That is 1/4 wave separation - not half-wave. One half wave on 80 is roughly 139 feet (984/3.55/2 = 138.6 feet). Since you are using 1/4 wave spacing and a PVS-2 (which is a quadrature device if I re
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00283.html (8,460 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Joe...I was wrong in my post.  My verticals are 1/2 wave apart on 80m, which is the same as 1/4 wave on 160.   After writing my message, I went back and added the 66' for clarity, and should have bee
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00284.html (11,011 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:50:15 -0500
That changes things ... Seems to me you have two options ... feed them in phase which provides a bidirectional pattern *broadside* or feed them out of phase which provides a bidirectional pattern *e
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00285.html (11,044 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: N7KA@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 06:26:37 +0000 (UTC)
This looks like the Engineering Phasing report mentioned. I have an older version, this one seems to be reformatted. Give it a try. http://www.classicinternational.eu/_clientfiles/info_extra/hygainph
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00286.html (7,797 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:13:23 -0400
Just double the length of the phasing lines and then they will reach. Herb, KV4FZ After writing my message, I went back and added the 66' for clarity, and should have been 132' You are correct, using
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00287.html (11,556 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: phasing line lengths for phased verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:42:49 -0500
I really DO have 80m verticals that are 1/2 wave apart. (incidentally I share the radial fields with the 160m antennas which are 1/4 wave apart) So the question remains, how to properly feed phased v
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00288.html (9,521 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu