Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+poor\s+antenna\,\s+rich\s+score\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+poor\s+antenna\,\s+rich\s+score\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: poor antenna, rich score (score: 1): Author: kk@cg.yu (V.Kecman); Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:06:11 +0100; I was at Ivo's QTH in Nicosia. He uses an inverted V, attached to his 50ft tower. Actually, the tower is on the roof of one story house, and there is additional 10ft or more. Some people suggested to; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00085.html (7,481 bytes)
2. Topband: poor antenna, rich score (score: 1): Author: 9a3a@spidernet.com.cy (Ivo Pezer, 5B4ADA/9A3A); Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:11:27 +0200; My comments are for those HAMs who are reluctant to try Topband without "proper" antenna. I keep telling people that it's important that they GET ON TOPBAND in the first place. The Band is full of su; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00087.html (9,203 bytes)
3. Topband: poor antenna, rich score (score: 1): Author: NX4D@magicnet.net (Doug Waller); Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:56:38 -0500; <005d01bf7318$8e17d880$76929ac2@spidernet.net> Sender: owner-topband@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C I lay claim; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00088.html (8,096 bytes)
4. Topband: poor antenna, rich score (score: 1): Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos); Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 17:20:51 PST; My topband antenna was picked on, even before I put it up, with comments like "where's the rest of it?", "you're going to use 1/8 wavelength elevated radials - are you nuts", and the like. Its 38 fee; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00092.html (8,034 bytes)
5. Topband: poor antenna, rich score (score: 1): Author: sire@omen.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 07:49:21 +0800; It has been nice to see Ivo 5B4ADA, Kele YU1AO/6 and Rys SP5EWY remarks about supposedly poor cloud-warming antennas. My 160m DXCC was worked using an inverted-U dipole for 160m at around 13 - 15m hi; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00097.html (8,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]