Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+question\s+about\s+antenna\s+bandwidth\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 14:42:46 -0400
If I were to extend my 1/4-wave inverted-L to a 3/8-wave L, and tune out the inductance with a fixed capacitor at the base, what would this do to the broadbandedness of the antenna? Inquiring minds..
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00059.html (6,323 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 16:20:33 -0400
Hi Rob, The 2:1 SWR points on my extended 3/8-wave inverted "L" elements are about 70-KHz apart...I have no idea what those points might be in a "regular" 1./4-wave vertical. ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00060.html (6,909 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: k8gg@voyager.net
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 17:09:40 -0400 (EDT)
No, but if a variable capacitor is used the reactance nul can be moved up or down the band for resonance.  This can also be done with a 5/16 wl inverted-L which usually comes in close to 50 ohms resi
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00062.html (7,548 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 20:19:30 -0400
Narrow it due to it being a bit less ground dependent plus the high Q of the capacitor. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00069.html (7,832 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Roy" <royanjoy@ncn.net>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:48:44 -0500
There is an old basic principle to remember about this, "The fewer the components in general, the broader the bandwidth." 73, Roy K6XK _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... .
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00077.html (7,756 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:22:19 -0400
Another rule for this is "the lower the Q of the matching network the greater the bandwidth." Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00078.html (8,139 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:51:32 -0400
Thanks, gentlemen (Eddy, K8GG, ZR, Roy, Herb, et. al.), for all the feedback on this. So, it seems it's pretty much what I expected -- if you tune an antenna for better results on one frequency, you
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00079.html (8,358 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:58:34 +0200
I don't know how much bandwidth you could get with coaxial quarterwave transformer (say, two quarterwave lengths of coax in parallel to transform 12 Ohm of an inverted L to 50 Ohm)? In previous life
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00080.html (9,367 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:37:28 -0600
Roy, you didn't specify the vertical length of your inverted-L but I'll assume it is 50' and that your base-referred ground loss is 5 ohms. Using NEC-2 for the 1/4 wavelength inverted-L I get a 2:1 V
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00084.html (8,864 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: k8gg@voyager.net
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 08:03:40 -0400 (EDT)
Rob: A typical 3/8 wl inverted-L antenna is about 65 feet vertical and 125 feet horizontal or sloping back downwards at a slight angle.  This means that 2/3 of the wire is horizontal near the ground
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00110.html (10,017 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Rob Stampfli <rob@cboh.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:13:25 -0400
Thanks, George. Actually, my intent isn't to perfect a DX antenna, but rather, to get the piece of wire with the current maxima up in the air. As it is, with the current node on the ground, I suspect
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00132.html (8,624 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu