Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+rigs\s+for\s+top\s+band\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Hi All, I figured I would ask the group what they thought of a few rigs. First: do any of you have experience with the FT-2000? How about the FT-2000 with the Mu-tune units? Next: the Ten Tec Orion I
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00042.html (7,074 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Well, I got some interesting answers to my original inquiry about the FT-2000 vs. Orion II. In one I was told to check out the Omni VII. So, lets toss that in to the equation too. I didnt consiter it
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00047.html (8,668 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Ian Wade <g3nrw@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:07:13 +0100
Steve, Have you considered the software defined radios, like the new Flex-5000A, or the older SDR-1000? http://www.flex-radio.com/ Cost-wise they compare well with the top-of-the-range legacy radios
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00049.html (8,095 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:16:55 -0700
In a word - "YES!". The K3 is not based upon the K2 at all. It is a totally different animal. It uses a first IF around 8 MHz and essentially your narrow crystal filter is your roofing filter. After
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00052.html (8,635 bytes)

5. Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:29:51 -0400
N6TR: Actually they are published. See: http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3_specs.htm Although these only go to 5 kHz spacings, the IMD and BDR numbers are indicative of very high performance (phase noise
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00053.html (7,613 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Smith" <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:58:41 -0500
Good day Bill: I there are some real fine transceivers that will do a good job. Don't forget, there are not many on 160 that can hear the sun come up. Merv K9FD could when he lived across the river f
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00055.html (7,232 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:06:05 -1000
Happy to say in my present (new) location I can again hear sun rise or sunset noise difference. Now if I can get an antenna fro xmting up. I have both the Ft-1000D and a TT Omni 6 plus here at prese
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00056.html (8,506 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Rehm" <bradrehm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:31:55 -0500
Steve, A few thoughts about the FT-2000: I've waited for the folks with more experience with the FT-2000 to weigh in with their comments. But since you're still wondering if the MTUs would improve th
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00062.html (10,658 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:04:32 -0400
On 18th August, Tree wrote... "...So - keep it on your radar. This little 8 pound box is not only easy to use, but has the performance to turn many heads." ** Back some 4-5 years ago, I helped to man
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00063.html (8,197 bytes)

10. Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Bottom line...when the '2000 was announced, I started putting money aside to buy one. After using one for a couple hours, I changed my mind. I'll keep my MK V a little longer. ** I was also tempted w
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00068.html (7,485 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Ian Wade <g3nrw@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:34:12 +0100
Tree, when the radio goes into production, will users be able to download and install further DSP updates, or will they be stuck with the version they get when they buy the radio? (In the back of my
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00083.html (8,663 bytes)

12. Topband: Rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: "EA2LU Jorge Daglio" <ea2lu@telefonica.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:13:29 +0200
I&acute;am curious about any comments of the Icom IC7800 by users of Top band, or who, had the opportunity to test one on this band? Thanks 73 Jorge EA2LU ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00085.html (7,304 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:19:05 -0700
Downloading updates will be a common thing to the K3 owners. The process is being designed to be very easy and is working very well - even in the beta test mode. Exactly. Tree _______________________
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00086.html (8,580 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Rigs for top band (score: 1)
Author: Brendan Minish <ei6iz.brendan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:45:02 +0100
I have a 7800 with the 3Khz roofing filters. It's a very good rig, my previous ICOM was a 756pro Mk2 which was quite inferior to my K2 on 160m A well setup K2 is also very good radio for top band how
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00087.html (9,681 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu