Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+shortened\s+\&\s+low\s+dipole\s+for\s+160M\-\-transmit\/receive\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+shortened\s+\&\s+low\s+dipole\s+for\s+160M\-\-transmit\/receive\s+issues\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receive issues (score: 1): Author: franknorton@home.com (Frank Norton KB8XU); Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 08:39:48 -0400; Hello to all, I am one of the folks who lives on a city lot, but lucky enough to have it be fairly large (120' x 150'), The house is located in the front and side (L shaped ranch). A single 50 foot c; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00050.html (9,493 bytes)
2. Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receive issues (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:51:33 -0400; I've been really slack at getting my Dayton talk on my web page, but I can convey several important results of a series of tests and measurements I did. Coaxial traps are the worse commonly used tra; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00060.html (8,760 bytes)
3. Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receive issues (score: 1): Author: kolson@erols.com (Kevin Olson); Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:49:49 -0400; Gee Whiz. I guess my over 260 DXCC on 160 meters with only a dipole with the apex never above 90 feet doesn't work for DX. I guess I'll quit now while I'm ahead! *Nice job! But 90 feet is MUCH higher; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00121.html (7,033 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]