Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:13:58 -0800
Very interesting hearing some strange openings this morning on topband. Seems there is some path between the pacific Northwest and sporadic places around the country with some kind of "duct". I heard
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00201.html (7,138 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:38:40 -0600
Sounds very much like the propagation associated with the "remote" duct ! 73 Joel W5ZN www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00203.html (7,658 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Blaschke, w5un" <w5un@wt.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:18:11 +0000
Could it be RHR? On 1/13/2016 4:13 PM, Tree wrote: Very interesting hearing some strange openings this morning on topband. Seems there is some path between the pacific Northwest and sporadic places a
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00214.html (7,554 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:08:03 -0500
I am sure that this is someone remoting. Nothing wrong with it, in my opinion. They can legally use their own call assuming they are licensed to be where they are, which isn't hard on 160M. And its n
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00215.html (8,380 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:14:15 -0500
In the case of the RHR guys, they are constantly traveling to their remote locations doing tower and antenna work. That's what they do. Maintaining their system requires traveling and time. Ray is ab
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00216.html (9,275 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Joe <wl7e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:24:05 -0900
I believe Tree's main point was the station in question was 2 hours after sunrise at his qth on 160. I heard the same station. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00217.html (9,876 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:26:57 -0500
Ed N1UR said "It seems non-trivial to me as to how to maintain these remote stations." My guess is it was someone using the Portland, OR station in the Remote Ham Radio network (http://www.remotehamr
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00218.html (7,760 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Blaschke, w5un" <w5un@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:43:06 +0000
I will say this: operating a remote station (for money) owned and managed by someone else will never be as satisfying as operating your own station, built by your hands. But than again, if you have n
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00219.html (8,855 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:26:47 -0500
That is NOT ALL true, SOME stations are indeed other hams' stations and they get a piece of the action based on what the monthly draw of revenue on the station. However, MANY and the majority of the
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00220.html (10,017 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:57:59 -0500
Everyone, I stand corrected with respect to the ownership of the RHR stations. But the main point is that Tree's observation was likely a remote station (the one in Portland, OR being most likely), a
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00221.html (7,910 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:33:11 -0400
I have lost my amateur station in three major hurricanes over the years here, everything including radios (from water) and antennas. I have also rebuilt them a four different locations until I finall
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00223.html (11,746 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:49:11 -0800
On Thu,1/14/2016 10:33 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote: I have full remote station here but it only functions for contest operated by a cliff dweller in NYC who cares not for DXCC credit. The problem wi
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00224.html (9,527 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:27:05 -0500
Lets face it, the RHR guys take out sizeable ads in QST often times full page ads and so it would be shooting themselves in the foot if they in any way went against RHR. SO they did the next best thi
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00229.html (10,483 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Blaschke, w5un" <w5un@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:28:00 +0000
Look at the situation; There are just a few stateside RHR for rent locations. As more and more "hams" begin to use these sites to work DXpeditions, the queue length to access one of these sites will
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00231.html (12,689 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Mattson" <k8bhz@alphacomm.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:44:33 -0500
SO they did the next best thing and left it up to the individual to decide what is moral or ethical for them. If someone gets DXCC honor roll using that system, good for them but it >doesn't hold wat
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00234.html (11,140 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:52:20 -0400
Dave, What will happen then is that the RHR gurus will just jack up the rates to take the hams with deepest pockets. Additionally the laws of supply will kick in and more RHR station and others will
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00236.html (13,386 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:05:06 +0000
This is a BIG issue to grapple with. It would make sense to me that a callsign transmitted over the air should correspond to a station location in a publically viewable registry and if the location o
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00237.html (15,954 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:22:32 -0500
And, what happened to identifying with the call of the station you were operating? It's still in the regs. 73, Roger SO they did the next best thing and left it up to the individual to decide what is
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00238.html (12,410 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Blaschke, w5un" <w5un@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:25:40 +0000
Herb, when that happens, ham radio, as we know it, will be over. (aren't we already used to this sort of thing happening in our time and in our country?) Dave, W5UN On 1/14/2016 9:52 PM, Herbert Scho
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00239.html (15,040 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:28:08 +0000
you know,,,at 74 if I need something that bad,,, I need to re-evaluate my priorities,,, what ever I work will be from my home , or my farm, 32 miles away I am very fortunate to have both and a basic
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00240.html (14,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu