Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

121. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:35:23 -0500; A very interesting interpretation of the FCC regs by a former FCC official. Whether a liability lawyer would agree with him is debatable in my opinion. Just like a bartender can be liable for serving; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00391.html (9,256 bytes)
122. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Charles Moizeau <w2sh@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:28:41 -0500; Stew was a magnificently correct person. His distinctive white lettered callsign on a background gracing his slightly oversize, but legal to suit USPS size limits, QSL card is wall candy in my shack.; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00398.html (11,822 bytes)
123. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:08:48 -0500; Sounds a lot like the RHR folks! A friend of mine at the Georgia State Public Service Training Center (right down my street) says this social trend, made pandemic through Internet, has even been assi; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00402.html (10,142 bytes)
124. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:24:26 -0500; That was not nice. Lou W1QJ Sounds a lot like the RHR folks! _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://ww; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00403.html (10,712 bytes)
125. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:37:03 -0500; This reflector has gone down the toilet with personal BS that serves no purpose except to pick fights. After 20 years, I'm leaving it.It sure went down the tubes. That was not nice. Lou W1QJ Sounds a; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00409.html (11,823 bytes)
126. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:52:42 -0500; Tom, by you leaving would just fuel the egos of those VERY few who want to stir up trouble. If we get off the discussion things should return to normal. I am done with the RHR discussion. When it was; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00410.html (12,551 bytes)
127. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:57:01 +0000; I agree 100%. Let's have all on this reflector act like Gentlemen. 160 is, after all, the "Gentlemen's Band". We should live up to the name. Bob AA6VB Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Re; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00411.html (13,639 bytes)
128. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0500; Sounds like someone retreating to his Homogenous Cluster where everyone agrees with him. Bye, Tom After 20 years, I'm leaving it.It sure went down the tubes. That was not nice. Lou W1QJ --Original Me; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00412.html (11,384 bytes)
129. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:23:11 -0500 (EST); I would see this as analo g ou s to what happened in contesting. Originally, you could use 2 meter spotting nets to help "find" multipliers, no problem. Eventually, f olks in less populated areas co; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00419.html (11,265 bytes)
130. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: nn4t@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:47:31 +0000 (UTC); Gentlemen. I wonder if Tree regrets beginning this discussion with his post the other day? I suspect he might. The discussion of ethics has been interesting to me. Most of the comments have been thou; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00421.html (12,310 bytes)
131. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:06:34 -0800; I know of only one, who admitted to me that he was running 2.5kW. Leaving aside the illegality of it, do you also view that as unethical? Absolutely. Does anyone confront operators who flaunt the rul; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00423.html (9,685 bytes)
132. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:07:28 -0500; By all means, please don't leave, Tom. Until recently, this sort of junk stayed on CQ-Contest. Perhaps we can give it the cold shoulder and it'll wither away. This is still the place I look to for se; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00424.html (13,141 bytes)
133. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Howard K2HK <howk2@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:22:32 -0500; I have followed with some interest. Early posts had some merit but it soon turns into a free for all. I have had my own thoughts for many years but thought this was not the forum to express them sinc; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00426.html (15,145 bytes)
134. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baughn" <baughn@centurylink.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:32:11 -0500; Amen Howard...The reflectors are great as a lot of us learn quite a bit. The line gets crossed when it becomes a " I can urinate farther than you can" event. I think some could check their egos and i; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00429.html (15,581 bytes)
135. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 16:30:18 -0500; Steve, your question has a simple answer. It is undeniable that it is illegal and unethical and should be shunned. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Gentlemen. I wonder if Tree regrets beginning this discuss; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00436.html (14,974 bytes)
136. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:17:35 +0000; Roger, and the group,,, I know of NO one in recent history that has given of his self and resources more that Tom, w8ji- and sir, I am going to call you down on this--shame on you--thanks to what app; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00440.html (12,668 bytes)
137. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:56:14 +0000 (UTC); Let's all calm down. I believe this latest tirade started with RHR. I may not elect to use it but anyone else is entitled to use the service. We've survived Incentive Licensing, code free licenses, s; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00441.html (9,654 bytes)
138. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:13:05 -0500; Absolutely correct Mike, and some of the other pills were much harder to swallow than this one. Let's all calm down. I believe this latest tirade started with RHR. I may not elect to use it but anyon; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00442.html (10,274 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 138
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]