Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Kris Mraz <n5kilomike@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:19:15 -0600; Which brings to mind another issue: 160m card checkers will disallow a card if the DX QSO occurred in the middle of the day since the path would be impossible. Can't make that assumption, anymore. Kr; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00267.html (9,456 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:35:00 -0600; I was specifically told by one checker that he doesn't even check the time of a Topband QSO. Go figure. Larry K5RK Which brings to mind another issue: 160m card checkers will disallow a card if the D; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00268.html (9,058 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:34:04 -0400; Well so much for the ARRL card checkers as unless the checker here in a U.S. Territory has a DXCC on 160 they will not accredit him/her and I must send the cards for 160 meter (just 160 meters) via t; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00269.html (11,180 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:38:56 -0500; <<RHR is just another form of progress due to advances in technology, if we did not embrace progress in ham radio technology we would all still be talking to one another on Lunch boxes and Gooney box; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00270.html (15,716 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Mike Cizek W0VTT <mgcizek@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:40:35 -0600; Larry, et al, I am a 160 card checker, and I damn well DO check the times! I'm sorry to report that I have found cases where "impossible" QSOs were claimed, and reported them to the mother ship in Ne; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00271.html (9,760 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:45:47 -0600; Mike, if you were presented with a card showing a Topband QSO that took place two hours after the sunrise at the QTH of the card holder how would you handle it? Let's assume for the sake of simplicit; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00272.html (9,195 bytes)
47. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:46:52 -0500; card if the DX QSO occurred in the middle of the day since the path would be impossible. Can't make that assumption, anymore.<<< LOTW is responsible for 90% or more 160m DXCC confirmation and there; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00273.html (8,294 bytes)
48. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:41:50 -0500; I am a 160 card checker, and I damn well DO check the times! I'm sorry to report that I have found cases where "impossible" QSOs were claimed, and reported them to the mother ship in Newington. I wou; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00274.html (9,232 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Carl Braun <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 03:11:58 +0000; JC hit the nail on the head...lets identify those who are using RHR openly. My preference would be a specific suffix designator that would identify the transmitting station and then let's see if anyo; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00275.html (17,419 bytes)
50. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:35:47 -0500; In the case discussed of a station remoting in and not properly identifying (ie an Italian station remoting a USA station but continuing to use the Italian callsign), it seems to me that the FCC woul; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00276.html (8,543 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Kris Mraz <n5kilomike@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:23:59 -0600; Aha. You got me there :-) _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00277.html (8,903 bytes)
52. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:52:45 -0500; It is the same thing as if he was here physically, he must use his call with a / w2 or whatever. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail In the case discussed of a station remoting in and not properly identifying; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00279.html (9,363 bytes)
53. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:57:43 -0500; We have to see if RHR is a registered trademark name so that when we say things like this we make sure we are not singling out this specific group that supplies this service as opposed to anyone who; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00280.html (21,186 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:01:12 -0500; Tom please comment on the 4pm QSL card from ct. Claiming S2 at 4pm local time. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail I am a 160 card checker, and I damn well DO check the times! I'm sorry to report that I have f; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00281.html (10,439 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:13:30 -0500; And what about the S2 QSO I talk about? Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Mike, if you were presented with a card showing a Topband QSO that took place two hours after the sunrise at the QTH of the card hold; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00282.html (10,966 bytes)
56. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:16:57 -0500; Once again what would you do with the S2 QSL card? Sent from AOL Mobile Mail I was specifically told by one checker that he doesn't even check the time of a Topband QSO. Go figure. Larry K5RK --Origi; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00283.html (10,401 bytes)
57. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:24:26 -0500; Do you have any idea what information your cell phone can tell others when you say OK to the terms of the apps you download? Talk about technology and ethics? But it seems many of us allow them to sc; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00284.html (8,152 bytes)
58. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:57:41 -0500; Correct, but if he doesnt, its actually the primary responsibility of the control operator/station owner to shut down the station to prevent further illegal transmissions. Ed N1UR It is the same thin; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00285.html (10,385 bytes)
59. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: "Ilmo Anttila" <ilmo.anttila@qualisys.fi>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:04:39 +0200; If we lived now 2008/2009 I could have a possibility to work K5P in the daylight at about 2PM. (Right this year no possibility). Would that QSO be rejected for my DXCC count? 73! Ilmo, OH2BO --Alkupe; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00286.html (11,026 bytes)
60. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:14:36 -0400; Yes indeed since the transmission originated in the US and a foreign operating sending his call must use the proper ID such as W4/IK9XXX Herb, KV4FZ On 1/15/2016 12:35 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote: In the cas; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00287.html (9,452 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]