Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:19:04 -0400
This is very strange as Jeff, VY2ZM during the CQ 160 meter event works Western Europe at high noon PEI time. Herb, KV4FZ Larry K5RK Which brings to mind another issue: 160m card checkers will disall
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00288.html (10,252 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 03:20:32 -0500
As I said earlier, stations are no longer licensed iirc. That said, the control operator is fully responsible. I will check on this with the RHR group. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Yes indeed since the
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00289.html (10,486 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 03:28:28 -0500
I can't be 100% sure but I think this will all wash down to the fact that stations are no longer licensed and the control operator is fully responsible. And I do believe that is the case. RHR has law
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00290.html (14,476 bytes)

64. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:02:18 -0400
That's what lawyers get paid for as they can parse any rule as their billing clock is running. This is their profession and having their pro-client opinion is essentially meaningless. The ARRL, of as
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00291.html (16,742 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:04:52 -0500
It would be hard to believe that the control operator is outside the US, beyond the FCC jurisdiction, and no one in the US is responsible. If that is the case, its pretty scary in my opinion. 73 Ed N
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00292.html (11,614 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:18:20 -0500
Thankfully, this is not the case. The FCC rules are quite clear on this issue. From Section 107 of Part 97 FCC rules: (a) The station licensee is responsible for the proper operation of the station i
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00293.html (12,296 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:35:27 -0500
I heard from a friend, who talked to his uncle who stated that he heard on a 20m net, that hams are allowed to disregard any FCC rule that they find inconvenient. 73, Roger (a) The station licensee i
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00294.html (9,633 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:31:20 +0100
Can they add /RHR or such please? So I can choose if I want to make this kind of QSO. BTW, I require a remote solution for climbing Everest or participate in Car Racing. That is currently not possibl
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00299.html (10,977 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:34:16 -0500
Roger, I have forwarded this issue to the owner of RHR and waiting for his reply. Lou I heard from a friend, who talked to his uncle who stated that he heard on a 20m net, that hamsare allowed to dis
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00300.html (10,177 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Raoul Coetzee via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:36:26 +0000 (UTC)
Well said Herb! Raoul ZS1C   Artificial insemination is advanced technology also but pray tell me that it is more fun.  We are not taking about an either- or situation of "embracing progress in amate
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00301.html (9,516 bytes)

71. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:37:25 -0500
It would be hard to believe that the control operator is outside the US, beyond the FCC jurisdiction, and no one in the US is responsible. If that is the case, its pretty scary in my opinion. 73 Ed N
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00302.html (11,854 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:00:01 -0500
I can't be 100% sure but I think this will all wash down to the fact that stations are no longer licensed and the control operator is fully responsible. And I do believe that is the case. RHR has law
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00303.html (12,843 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:03:39 -0500
Thanks Tom and to add to that this is what I received from Ray just a few minutes ago Stations are not licensed, individuals are, all ops on RHR are the control operator. Its no different than I goin
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00304.html (12,925 bytes)

74. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:10:31 -0500
There you have it folks. And guess what, The US government is very aware of RHR and is very impressed with the concept. Know what that means? This all comes up every time with this subject. I don't k
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00305.html (12,367 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:25:52 +0000
I think it means that you've been talking to someone in the Department of Agriculture. Vague claims do not prove a point. Dave Heil K8MN On 15-Jan-16 13:10, Louis Parascondola via Topband wrote: Ther
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00306.html (9,445 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:39:52 -0600
He's looking at YOU, Lou ("Conversion King") Parascondola. and You seem pretty tight with these guys. What is your affiliation? http://www.remotehamradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/RHR-ARRL-REVI
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00307.html (9,251 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:50:47 -0500
I would think a few fines issued by the FCC to the remote station holder, would shut these games down in a hurry. I wonder if the RHR station owners that are being leased out by individuals realize t
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00308.html (11,011 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baughn" <baughn@centurylink.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:52:01 -0500
Tom hits some excellent points here. How is the RHR issue any different than say the owner of a "big gun" station allowing others to come over an operate using their callsigns for DXCC? I know of one
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00309.html (13,054 bytes)

79. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:00:07 -0400
Climbing Mt. Everest is something of vast personal acheivement but land on top with a helicopter and having your picture taken to prove you were there is quite another. Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ <http:/
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00310.html (13,125 bytes)

80. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:02:01 -0600
I can get the ruling they go by. We'll be waiting with bated breath, Lou Parascondola. - Larry K5RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00311.html (8,705 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu