Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+strange\s+propagation\s*$/: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:04:58 -0500
Sorry, My email provider shows that my first and last name come up in the headers. For those who may not see that, I'm Lou W1QJ and I am personal friends with the owners of RHR, Ray W2RE and Lee WW2D
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00312.html (11,515 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:07:30 -0500
touche' Barry N1EU _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00313.html (13,975 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:12:32 -0500
In that case the government should get off it's butt and bring the rules up to date. As it is, we have the FCC publishing rules for the amateur service and the ARRL and others saying it's fine to dis
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00315.html (13,185 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:10:28 -0500
Larry, I posted it all an hour ago. I can get the ruling they go by. We'll be waiting with bated breath, Lou Parascondola. - Larry K5RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.conte
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00316.html (9,276 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:18:44 +0100
Exactly my point. I find my fun in this hobby by (mutual) achievement. However, I will not try to dictate how others should have their fun. Still I have a personal choice in what kind of radio contac
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00317.html (10,571 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:22:36 -0600
The RHR lawyers consider a product review in QST by a non-ham as their legal review? How interesting. You said you can get the "ruling" that the RHR guys go by. The QST product review is it?!? - Larr
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00319.html (9,519 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:24:03 -0600
Correction.... should have read "non-lawyer". - Larry K5RK The RHR lawyers consider a product review in QST by a non-ham as their legal review? How interesting. You said you can get the "ruling" that
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00321.html (10,005 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:56:10 -0500
I'm sure qst did their homework on the issue first. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Correction.... should have read "non-lawyer". - Larry K5RK --Original Message-- From: Topband [<a href="mailto:topband-bo
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00322.html (11,289 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:01:35 -0600
So you're telling me that RHR and those RHR attorneys on retainer used a QST product review as their determination that their operation is legal? Just curious... are you an RHR subscriber, Lou? - Lar
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00323.html (12,547 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:04:32 -0700
Guys, seems to me this topic has been worked to death. Maybe it's time to give it a rest. Jim W8ZR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00324.html (8,544 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:25:47 -0400
This issue is ripe for discussion now. I should not be relegated to an out of sight out of mind position. It bothers many and is OK with some. It speaks to the soul of amateur radio and everything it
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00327.html (9,415 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:32:18 -0500
Larry, I don't want to argue with you. It's all legal period. No I'm not a subscriber. I have my own station that suits me well. I only need P5 for #1 honor roll and not much else would drive me to n
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00329.html (17,305 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:35:22 -0500
Herb, I don't know about you, but I'm waiting for flying cars. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail This issue is ripe for discussion now. I should not be relegated to an out of sight out of mind position. It b
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00330.html (10,134 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:45:14 -0500
You are right Jim. Why can't they accept that the FCC is OK with RHR and leave it at that ? Didn't they read what Tom graciously wrote to explain the whole thing? Done deal. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00332.html (8,911 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Milan Dlaba <ok1awz.milan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:04:40 +0100
Lou, I am ham for 50 years.I cant find, why they doing it.Definitly not for ham.I will tell You for wha.This is only bussines.They fell other aditional money to gain.Only sadness.Change hobby for few
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00334.html (17,542 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:03:54 -0600
watched, people pay a membership, they have to log in, and they know if caught breaking any law they lose a deposit and are booted. Safest -- yep... none of that pesky high voltage in the user's sha
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00335.html (9,310 bytes)

97. Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "lmlangenfeld@tds.net" <lmlangenfeld@tds.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:19:06 -0500 (EST)
Seems to me the final judge in all of this is the guy who stares back at you from the mirror every morning. There are a million ways to game the rules and outright cheat ... even in ham radio, where
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00336.html (8,394 bytes)

98. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baughn" <baughn@centurylink.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:25:31 -0500
Mark-very well said..As W8ZR noted earlier this horse has been beat to death enough..As has been well enumerated ad nauseum some like it some don't. Let's leave it at that and move on. Steve, WD8NPL
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00337.html (9,231 bytes)

99. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:32:34 -0800
Did you never listen to 75M as a kid? Have you listened recently? 30 minutes in either error should correct that false impression. :) 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http:
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00339.html (9,903 bytes)

100. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:35:41 -0400
Our to quote Frederick Nietzsche..."When you stare into the abyss the abyss stares back at you." Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ On 1/15/2016 1:19 PM, lmlangenfeld@tds.net wrote: Seems to me the final judge i
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00342.html (8,820 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu