Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+to\s+rotate\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+rotate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+to\s+rotate\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+rotate\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: to rotate or not to rotate (score: 1): Author: Ku7i@worldnet.att.net (Lane Zeitler); Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:32:02 -0800; Esteemed Reflectees, Is worth the hassle to be able to rotate the 5' per side shielded loop for 160 rcv? Putting it together right now and have a chance to put a rotor on it next week. Also, does hei; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00142.html (7,159 bytes)
2. Topband: to rotate or not to rotate (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:49:48 -0800; Hi Lane et. al. IMHO, you should rotate a loop unless you have only one axis of interest the reception pattern is usually a figure 8 in the plane of the loop, so it will be bidirectional, but have a; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00143.html (7,507 bytes)
3. Topband: to rotate or not to rotate (score: 1): Author: n0tt1@juno.com (N0TT@ juno.com); Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:50:34 EST; Hi Lane, I have used one of those for years. Ground mounted is just fine. Mine is fixed, but I know someone who uses a rotator and can effectively NULL OUT local 160m signals with it. I have heard th; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00144.html (7,167 bytes)
4. Topband: to rotate or not to rotate (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:21:58 -0500; Hi Lane, Not unless you have a well defined local noise or signal source, or coupling to a nearby object that is re-radiating noise or undesired signals. The nulls on a small loop are so sharp that n; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00149.html (8,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]