Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+topband\:\s+Web\s+Based\s+Receivers\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+topband\:\s+Web\s+Based\s+Receivers\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: topband: Web Based Receivers.. (score: 1): Author: Robert Briggs <vk3zl@bigpond.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:41:52 +1100; I fully endorse the idea from Steve K0SR on these Web Based receivers...There should be considerable delay on the output.. I have listened to a local station continuously calling over dxpedition stat; /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00086.html (7,126 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: topband: Web Based Receivers.. (score: 1): Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:20:11 +0300; This common "non-stop calling" operating practice has nothing to do with WEB based receivers but rather poor receiving and bad operating skills. If one uses WEB receiver he can easily calculate the a; /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00088.html (7,481 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: topband: Web Based Receivers.. (score: 1): Author: "G4GED Dave" <radiodave.g4ged@tiscali.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:47:44 -0800; An HB9 station did exactly the same thing during a major DXpedition recently, causing considerable QRM in EU and later admitted to a reliable source that he was using a web based remote receiver and; /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00089.html (7,849 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: topband: Web Based Receivers.. (score: 1): Author: "Slavomir Zeler" <ok1tn@seznam.cz>; Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:29:32 +0100; Hi to all on TB the remote qth, remote RX is sure interesting technical things. But it is not ham radio of our ancestors. It is good for not fair way. Gd DX on realy band slavek ok1tn -- Original Mes; /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00093.html (9,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]