Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tower\s+Load\s+Distribution\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tower\s+Load\s+Distribution\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths) (Stan Griffiths); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:27 2005; One topic that seems to be missing from all the tower discussions I see here lately is the fact that it is not simply the number of square feet of antenna that loads the tower, but how those square f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00258.html (7,133 bytes)
2. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: Dave Hockaday <wb4iuy@nando.net> (Dave Hockaday); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:27 2005; Hi Stan and the gang. I've been busy and missed the beginnings of this thread. Is there tower loading/modeling software out there for amateur applications?? Maybe something with Rohn 25/45/55 stuff?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00260.html (7,702 bytes)
3. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: Big Don <bigdon@eskimo.com> (Big Don); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005; All of these discussions on tower/antenna loading have pretty much assumed a steady-state constant max wind velocity and max windload from which you can compare resulting stresses with the manufactur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00281.html (9,388 bytes)
4. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005; As I recall from engineering classes in college, the problem with the bridge was it became a resonant structure, and therefore required very little energy to get it swinging back and forth. It had to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00292.html (7,799 bytes)
5. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: Big Don <bigdon@eskimo.com> (Big Don); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005; That's exactly the point. Go watch, for example, a long boom flopping with the gusts, or the tower twisting and untwisting when hammered by the rotor slop stops being hit. Whatever the tower/antenna; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00303.html (8,278 bytes)
6. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: JKAHRS@delphi.com (JKAHRS@delphi.com); Date: Mon Feb 12 19:33:41 1996; On 12-FEB-1996 01:18:25.5 bigdon said to the REFLECTOR <snip> <snip> Big Don is correct. What seems to be a simple problem, air flow around a cylinder....read "wire, mast, element, tubing"...is NOT!; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00308.html (9,069 bytes)
7. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths) (Stan Griffiths); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:30 2005; Hi Bruce, Here is an example of what I mean when I say I haven't seen the calculations I think we need. Assume a Rohn 25 tower with the rotator mounted in the normal place, about 3 feet below the to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00341.html (10,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]