Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tower\s+Loading\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: kurscj@oampc12.csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V)
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 12:51:52 -0600
Reader poll: Those of you with towers larger than 70': What tower are you using? How much windloading do you have at the top? How much additional side mount? AND Who here has actually calculated the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00055.html (8,964 bytes)

2. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:31:18 -0500 (EST)
Yes. 73, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: K7LXC@contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00071.html (7,975 bytes)

3. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Tower #1: 11 sections of Rohn 25. 5 el 10 meter beam 10 feet above top of tower. 6 el 15 meter beam at top of tower. 4 el 10 at 70 feet. 4el 10 at 55 feet. 4 el 15 at 50 feet. Never actually calcula
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00074.html (11,975 bytes)

4. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 19:36:29 -0500 (EST)
Uh, everyone I hope!?! Actually the figure in the catalog is the total TOWER loading with the normal configuration being antennas mounted at the top of the tower. Most communications and many amateur
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00082.html (10,620 bytes)

5. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: hb@cpimaging.com (Howard Brainen)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:51:16 -0800 (PST)
14 sections of Rohn 55G, sitting on base section 3 ft above ground with rotating bearing (RTS systems). Rotating guy rings at 40, 80 and 120 feet. 2 sections above top ring. 15 feet of mast coming o
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00083.html (10,292 bytes)

6. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: sawyers@inav.net (Steve Sawyers n0yvy)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 20:44:10 -0600
If you want professional advice, i.e. no handwaving, then call ARRL head quarters and get the name of the Volunteer Consulting Engineer in your area. Make an appointment and arrange an initial visit.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00084.html (7,734 bytes)

7. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: kurscj@oampc12.csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 09:28:46 -0600
Are we getting a little short here, Steve?? It is not my intention to "outguess" Rohn, but to do several, iterative calculations myself. Rohn tower applications as drawn/described in many pages, are
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00089.html (12,319 bytes)

8. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:34:48 -0500 (EST)
And don't forget the Tower Prime Directive: Do what the manufacturer says. The converse is also true: Don't do what they don't tell you. 73, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH -- professional tower supplies and
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00090.html (8,750 bytes)

9. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: sawyers@inav.net (Steve Sawyers n0yvy)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 20:42:50 -0600
The TIA-222-F Tower Structure Standards shows an accepted method of determining wind areas and wind loading based on simplified and standardized formula. It provides wind speed design requirements ba
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00102.html (9,386 bytes)

10. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Again, we would ALL like to know that stuff. Believe me, we are not intentionally keeping secrets from you . . . How do you know this? It certainly is not obvious to me . . . This is what you learn
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00118.html (13,831 bytes)

11. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:57:45 -0800 (PST)
I guess this means you can't sidemount a Yagi or put one more than a couple of feet above the top of a tower . . . Stan w7ni@teleport.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html S
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00119.html (8,385 bytes)

12. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: SPARHAWK@avtcorp.com (Bryan Sparrowhawk)
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 16:27:26 -0800
I'd like to pump this thread for more information ... but first a comment on what's transpired. Calculations certainly help to take the guesswork out of tower installation design. However, the 'comfo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00123.html (9,822 bytes)

13. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 08:40:04 EST
K1VR: We had one New Hampshire ham lose 165' of Rohn 25 with nothing but a 20 meter beam on top. He had used screw in anchors and after weeks of heavy fall rains, the earth turned to soup and one pul
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00139.html (8,918 bytes)

14. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 08:40:04 EST
calculations] K1VR: Each time this thought jumps up, I try to tamp it back down. A friend or acquaintance, e-mail correspondent, columnist, or software writer incurs no liability to a third party inj
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00140.html (10,230 bytes)

15. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: w2pj@FRONTIERNET.NET (Paul Mackanos)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 15:28:50 +0000
Check my web page and check the photo of WHY DOESN'T MY ANTENNA TURN !! then E-Mail me, and I can give you some tips on what NOT to do !!!! -- Paul Mackanos W2PJ 86 Close Hollow Drive Hamlin, NY 1446
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00146.html (8,136 bytes)

16. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: Joe Subich" <W8IK@ibm.net (Joe Subich)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 97 19:42:16 -0500
steel is rated between 1.5:1 and 1.7:1 depending on several factors related its size/shape. I don't remember the specifics ... that information is at the office. 73, ... Joe Subich, W8IK ex-AD8I <W8I
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00162.html (8,662 bytes)

17. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: sawyers@inav.net (Steve Sawyers n0yvy)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 19:38:14 -0600
EIA Standards, Publications, and Standards Proposals are available from: Global Engineering Documents a division of IHS 15 Inverness Way, Englewood, Colorado 80112 5704. For pricing, member discounts
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00188.html (10,367 bytes)

18. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: bcotter@service1.uky.edu (Bill Cotter)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:01:58 -0500
Folks, I agree with Bryan's ideas on discussing tower installation failures. We can build our systems to specifications as best we can and feel somewhat secure because we did what the manufacturer su
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00197.html (12,231 bytes)

19. Tower Loading (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 02:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Hi Bryan, After 44 years in ham radio and watching hundreds of towers very carefully all of that time, I can't think of a single failure of the type you describe. I am very interested in what sort o
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00263.html (8,880 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu