- 1. Towers & insurance (score: 1)
- Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O Hachadorian)
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 13:22:21 EST
- I just received my new homeowners policy from Allstate. Because of some previous discussion on this reflector, I actually _read_ the policy to see if the tower was covered. It was pretty obvious that
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00352.html (7,333 bytes)
- 2. Towers & insurance (score: 1)
- Author: jerrys@bihs.net (Jerry Stuart)
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 16:45:23 -0600
- Nice thing about 'riders' there is no deductable...... -- Jerry Stuart KC5JAY E-Mail: jerrys@bihs.net Home: 7945 FM 1179 Bryan TX 77808-7621 Day work 409-778-3474 (9am-5pm) Fax 409-774-4885 o~ _[-/)
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00358.html (7,825 bytes)
- 3. Towers & insurance (score: 1)
- Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 23:19:09 -0800
- Dave, my "Deluxe" Allstate policy does cover my towers, both of them, (up to 10% of my basic coverage) because they are "other structures". I've already had one claim for wind damage to my 80M rotata
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00359.html (8,434 bytes)
- 4. Towers & insurance (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 10:43:55 -0500 (EST)
- I'll go along with Bill. Many times your insurance company will consider them appurtenant structures and the maximum indemnification (payment of compensation or reimbursement) will be limited to the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00382.html (9,632 bytes)
- 5. Towers & insurance (score: 1)
- Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 02:30:45 -0800 (PST)
- Food for Thought: How honest is it to file a claim for tower wind damage when the damage is caused by a bent water pipe mast . . . ? You could list dozens of failure modes that are due to stupid blun
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00387.html (7,246 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu