Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*US\s+Tower\s+MA40\s+Plan\s+Part\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*US\s+Tower\s+MA40\s+Plan\s+Part\s+II\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. US Tower MA40 Plan Part II (score: 1): Author: Spinosa@msn.com (Joe Spinosa); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 96 16:53:12 UT; First of all, thanks to all that responded to my original posting a few weeks ago. Much sound advice and good information. I've managed to convince my XYL that a 3'x3'x4' hole won't be so bad if I bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00209.html (10,840 bytes)
2. US Tower MA40 Plan Part II (score: 1): Author: paul@eye.psych.umn.edu (Paul Beckmann); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 96 14:37:21 CDT; Joe and the rest of Tower Talk. Unfortunately, this sounds very similar to the beginning of the situation I find myself in (other than the $2600 filing fee!!) There was no set process in the City of; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00214.html (9,243 bytes)
3. US Tower MA40 Plan Part II (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 01:52:45 EDT; Joe: No attorney (and I am one) will ever advise you to act illegally. But I think you need some more sophisticated lawyering. I don't know CA law, but this is just another structure. In the U.S., if; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00221.html (13,589 bytes)
4. US Tower MA40 Plan Part II (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 12:51:49 -0700 (PDT); This is very similar to what we have to put up with in Washington County, Oregon. It is over $2000 and requires a "development permit" since there is no other way to handle it in their rules and reg; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00272.html (11,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]