Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Upcoming\s+DXAC\s+vote\s+on\s+DX\s+Operating\s+Practices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Upcoming\s+DXAC\s+vote\s+on\s+DX\s+Operating\s+Practices\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Upcoming DXAC vote on DX Operating Practices (score: 1): Author: winter@apple.com (Patty Winter); Date: Fri Jul 31 17:52:26 1992; Speaking as someone who normally has a really weak station at her disposal, I have to strongly disagree with Trey on that last statement. I have enough trouble trying to compete with everyone else in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-07/msg00000.html (7,656 bytes)
2. Upcoming DXAC vote on DX Operating Practices (score: 1): Author: reisert@mast.enet.dec.com (Jim Reisert, AD1C 31-Jul-1992 1102); Date: Fri Jul 31 11:58:16 1992; [NOTE: Bill made a mistake in his description of working by call areas. I have made the necessary corrections, enclosed by []. - AD1C] DX-Operating Practices The DXAC has been asked to vote on accept; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-07/msg00042.html (10,579 bytes)
3. Upcoming DXAC vote on DX Operating Practices (score: 1): Author: GARLOUGH@TGV.COM (Trey Garlough); Date: Fri Jul 31 10:03:46 1992; This is a good idea. Since control of the bands is mostly in the hands of the DXpeditioners, they are the ones who need to be educated. Educating the people calling in the pileups is important, but; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-07/msg00046.html (9,074 bytes)
4. Upcoming DXAC vote on DX Operating Practices (score: 1): Author: price@cod.nosc.mil (James N. Price); Date: Sat Aug 1 09:51:53 1992; -- Ya, recommend that the DX operators work NO MORE THAN 10 stations in a given call district at a time, and move on to the next one. This business of waiting for an hour worth of W2s, then 3s, etc.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-08/msg00000.html (6,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]