Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Voice\s+keyers\s+in\s+the\s+SS\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Voice\s+keyers\s+in\s+the\s+SS\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Voice keyers in the SS. (score: 1): Author: larryt@ateq.com (Larry Tyree x 7210); Date: Mon Nov 30 10:22:33 1992; I couldn't agree more with George about the garbage heard during the SS SSB. This is not a step forward, more like a step into the CB band. I was just fooling around searching and pouncing during the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00177.html (7,583 bytes)
2. Voice keyers in the SS. (score: 1): Author: alan@dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker); Date: Mon Nov 30 12:45:06 1992; I am with both you and George, Tree. Some of these guys with their DVKs are just plain obnoxious. It is clear that some of the op's do not know how to adjust them correctly and as a result, the CQs c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00179.html (6,624 bytes)
3. Voice keyers in the SS. (score: 1): Author: mraz@maverick.aud.alcatel.com (Kris Mraz); Date: Mon Nov 30 14:19:13 1992; I agree that voice keyers currently aren't being used very well. My second OP during SS (who hadn't been contesting for a number of years) about lost it the first time someone responded with a VK. Th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00180.html (7,422 bytes)
4. Voice keyers in the SS. (score: 1): Author: rhealy@arrl.org (Rus Healy NJ2L); Date: Mon Nov 30 14:41:12 1992; I agree with you, Tree. I think that where an RST is called for in a report, each operator should send some commonly recognized Morse character to represent it (whether it's 5-9-9, E-N-N, or whateve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00181.html (6,995 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]