- 1. We Robots (score: 1)
- Author: K2MM@MasPar.COM (K2MM@MasPar.COM)
- Date: Sun Aug 1 14:38:23 1993
- A couple of interesting quotes: Alan is mostly right, but there's merit to Jim's sentiment that the shift is not necessarily bad. I've noticed a common thread running through the pro-equalization pos
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00002.html (9,019 bytes)
- 2. We Robots (score: 1)
- Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET)
- Date: Mon Aug 2 09:48:48 1993
- Excellent posting by John, K2MM. Made me regret my own premature comments. I promise to read at least a full day's mail before replying in the future.... It would be unfortunate if contest bandwidth
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00015.html (7,893 bytes)
- 3. We Robots (score: 1)
- Author: K2MM@MasPar.COM (K2MM@MasPar.COM)
- Date: Mon Aug 9 12:55:17 1993
- Rick/N6XI: Thanks for the kind words. I thought your previous posting made sense. Replying to messages as you read them is a blessing/curse of e-mail. No reason to feel embarrassed. Other postings ha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00060.html (8,358 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu