Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*more\s+WW\s+CW\s+$what\s+else\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*more\s+WW\s+CW\s+$what\s+else\?$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:33:12 1992; It's hard to believe the bad coax switch was really hurting your rates that much. A 1 dB loss couldn't possibly affect your rates that much, but would have resulted in an average dissipation of 100 W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00184.html (6,862 bytes)
2. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:33:12 1992; It's hard to believe the bad coax switch was really hurting your rates that much. A 1 dB loss couldn't possibly affect your rates that much, but would have resulted in an average dissipation of 100 W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00203.html (6,863 bytes)
3. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:33:12 1992; It's hard to believe the bad coax switch was really hurting your rates that much. A 1 dB loss couldn't possibly affect your rates that much, but would have resulted in an average dissipation of 100 W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00217.html (6,841 bytes)
4. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00016.html (6,942 bytes)
5. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00281.html (6,955 bytes)
6. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00287.html (6,958 bytes)
7. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00333.html (6,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]