Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ts\-870\s+interesting\s+failure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ts\-870\s+interesting\s+failure\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. ts-870 interesting failure (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <robbins@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005; During the CQ 160m CW test we were attempting to use two radios so we could listen on one and run on the other. It was working fairly well until at one point we must have gotten too much RF into the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00165.html (7,808 bytes)
2. ts-870 interesting failure (score: 1): Author: na2n@ifam.com (na2n@ifam.com); Date: Thu Feb 8 08:12:23 1996; I'd replace both bulbs with Radio Shack .063amp fast-acting fuses (270-1044) in 5x20 mm fuse holders on the back panel. This has saved the sub-band RX in my FT-1000D and the front end of an IC-725 I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00173.html (6,607 bytes)
3. ts-870 interesting failure (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <robbins@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005; yes, it works even without changing the menu selection. i am very confused why it is wired in the way it is. the problem would be that it would be in parallel with the antenna on the so-239 if you ju; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00188.html (8,039 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]